A bilateral tumor model identifies transcriptional programs associated with patient response to immune checkpoint

Ivy X Chen1, Kathleen Newcomer2, Kristen E Pauken3,4

  • 1Edwin L. Steele Laboratories, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114.

Insights

Understanding resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is crucial. This study identifies early immune cell changes and molecular signatures in a murine model that predict patient response to ICB therapy, paving the way for improved cancer treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) shows efficacy in various cancers, but patient response varies.
  • Identifying mechanisms of resistance and predictive biomarkers is essential for optimizing ICB therapy.
  • Understanding the tumor microenvironment's role in ICB response is critical.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a resection and response-assessment approach for identifying predictive biomarkers of ICB response.
  • To investigate the tumor microenvironment changes associated with ICB response and resistance.
  • To discover novel biomarkers that segregate patient survival and predict response to ICB.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a bilateral tumor implantation murine metastatic breast cancer model (E0771) with anti-PD-1 therapy.
  • Analyzed early time points post-therapy initiation for immune cell populations (CD8+ T cells, MDSCs).
  • Performed RNA sequencing on intratumoral CD8+ T cells and assessed CXCR3 expression in a Cxcr3 knockout model.

Main Results:

  • Responding tumors showed increased CD8+ T cells and decreased myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) early after ICB initiation.
  • RNA sequencing revealed T cell exhaustion in nonresponding tumors and T cell activation in responding tumors.
  • Derived response/resistance signatures correlated with patient survival and ICB response; decreased CXCR3 expression was linked to resistance.

Conclusions:

  • The developed resection and response model effectively identifies biomarkers for ICB therapy response and resistance.
  • Early immune cell profiling and molecular signatures can predict patient outcomes.
  • Targeting CXCR3 or utilizing combination therapies may enhance ICB efficacy in nonresponding patients.

Related Concept Videos