Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Direct current electrical bone growth stimulation for spinal fusion.

W J Kane1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois.

Spine
|March 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

An electronic bone growth stimulator (EBGS) significantly improves lumbosacral fusion rates, particularly in high-risk patients. This device offers a promising solution for chronic low-back pain caused by abnormal motion.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Musculoskeletal disorders: regional examination and physical diagnosis.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

The future of family medicine.

The Journal of family practice·2001
Same author

What opportunities have we missed, and what bad deals have we made?

Family medicine·2001
Same author

The transverse orbicularis oculi myocutaneous flap: its use as nasal lining.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1999
Same author

Familial gigantiform cementoma.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1999
Same author

Sweat gland carcinoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of an expanded series in a single institution.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1998

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Spinal Surgery

Background:

  • Low-back pain is often caused by abnormal motion, necessitating spinal fusion.
  • Electronic bone growth stimulators (EBGS) were developed to enhance fusion success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of a totally implanted EBGS in facilitating lumbosacral fusion.
  • To compare fusion rates in patients treated with and without EBGS, including high-risk individuals.

Main Methods:

  • Initial nonrandomized studies (Series I-A) compared EBGS use to standard treatment.
  • A prospective randomized controlled trial (Series II) focused on "difficult patients" with high-risk factors.
  • Radiographic assessment by surgeons and independent radiologists determined fusion success.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Series I-A showed a 91.5% fusion rate with EBGS versus 80.5% without.
  • In Series II, EBGS treatment yielded an 81% fusion rate compared to 54% in controls (P=0.026).
  • Continuing nonrandomized study (Series I-B) reported a 90.5% success rate.

Conclusions:

  • EBGS significantly enhances lumbosacral fusion rates, especially in challenging cases.
  • The device is effective for patients with painful motion as the primary cause of low-back pain.
  • EBGS represents a valuable tool for improving surgical outcomes in spinal fusion procedures.