Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
Published on: November 10, 2023
Early Research on COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis
Yue Gong1, Ting-Can Ma2,3, Yang-Yang Xu4
1National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Insights
Early COVID-19 research rapidly expanded globally, with China leading publications. This analysis maps early research on the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), highlighting collaboration and knowledge gaps.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Infectious Diseases
- Virology
Background:
- The emergence of COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) in December 2019 presented a global health crisis.
- The rapid spread necessitated urgent scientific investigation into the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2).
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a bibliometric and knowledge mapping analysis of early COVID-19 research.
- To identify research trends, collaboration patterns, and knowledge gaps in the initial stages of the pandemic.
Main Methods:
- Bibliometric analysis of over 1,500 COVID-19 publications from PubMed and CNKI (January 1 - March 8, 2020).
- Knowledge mapping to visualize research on etiology, pathology, epidemiology, treatment, and prevention.
Main Results:
- A significant surge in COVID-19 publications occurred in early February 2020, with China as the primary contributor.
- Research focus varied based on epidemic situation and data accessibility.
- Unprecedented global scientific collaboration and information sharing were observed.
Conclusions:
- Early COVID-19 research demonstrated rapid global response and collaboration.
- Identified knowledge gaps in etiology, pathology, epidemiology, treatment, and prevention require further investigation.
- Future research directions for treatment and control are outlined.
Abstract:
In December 2019, an outbreak of pneumonia, which was named COVID-2019, emerged as a global health crisis. Scientists worldwide are engaged in attempts to elucidate the transmission and pathogenic mechanisms of the causative coronavirus. COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020, making it critical to track and review the state of research on COVID-19 to provide guidance for further investigations. Here, bibliometric and knowledge mapping analyses of studies on COVID-19 were performed, including more than 1,500 papers on COVID-19 available in the PubMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases from January 1, 2020 to March 8, 2020. In this review, we found that because of the rapid response of researchers worldwide, the number of COVID-19-related publications showed a high growth trend in the first 10 days of February; among these, the largest number of studies originated in China, the country most affected by pandemic in its early stages. Our findings revealed that the epidemic situation and data accessibility of different research teams have caused obvious difference in emphases of the publications. Besides, there was an unprecedented level of close cooperation and information sharing within the global scientific community relative to previous coronavirus research. We combed and drew the knowledge map of the SARS-CoV-2 literature, explored early status of research on etiology, pathology, epidemiology, treatment, prevention, and control, and discussed knowledge gaps that remain to be urgently addressed. Future perspectives on treatment, prevention, and control are also presented to provide fundamental references for current and future coronavirus research.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Retroviruses
Chi-square Analysis
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

