Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Political storms: Emergent partisan skepticism of hurricane risks
Elisa F Long1, M Keith Chen2, Ryne Rohla2
1Anderson School of Management, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. elisa.long@anderson.ucla.edu.
Political affiliation influences trust in science, impacting crucial behaviors. This study found that likely Trump voters were less likely to evacuate during Hurricane Irma, demonstrating a real-world consequence of science denial.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral economics
- Political science
- Environmental studies
Background:
- Growing mistrust in scientific evidence and government guidelines is linked to political affiliation.
- Skepticism spans issues like climate change, vaccine hesitancy, and COVID-19 risks.
- The behavioral impact of these beliefs on high-stakes decisions remains understudied.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether political affiliation influences self-protective behaviors during natural disasters.
- To quantify the impact of conservative media narratives on hurricane evacuation decisions.
Main Methods:
- Utilized GPS data from 2.7 million smartphone users in Florida and Texas.
- Combined mobility data with 2016 U.S. presidential election precinct-level results.
- Employed fine-grain geographic controls comparing voters within 150m of each other.
Main Results:
- Likely Trump-voting Florida residents were 10-11 percentage points less likely to evacuate Hurricane Irma compared to Clinton voters (34% vs. 45%).
- This evacuation gap was not observed in prior hurricane events.
- Results remained robust after controlling for geographic proximity.
Conclusions:
- Media-fueled skepticism towards scientific forecasts can lead to divergent self-protective behaviors.
- Science denialism has significant and measurable consequences on public safety decisions.
- Political polarization can undermine adherence to critical public health and safety advisories.
Related Concept Videos
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Fundamental Attribution Error
Group Polarization
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Groupthink
Unrealistic Optimism Bias

