Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Controlling Parkinson's Disease With Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation
Published on: July 16, 2014
Low-frequency oscillation suppression in dystonia: Implications for adaptive deep brain stimulation
D Piña-Fuentes1, M Beudel2, J C Van Zijl3
1University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neurosurgery, Groningen, the Netherlands; Expertise Center Movement Disorders Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Neurology, Groningen, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Background:
Low-frequency oscillations (LFO) detected in the internal globus pallidus of dystonia patients have been identified as a physiomarker for adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation (aDBS), since LFO correlate with dystonic symptoms and are rapidly suppressed by continuous DBS (cDBS). However, it is as yet unclear how LFO should be incorporated as feedback for aDBS.
Objectives:
to test the acute effects of aDBS, using the amplitude of short-lived LFO-bursts to titrate stimulation, to explore the immediate effects of cDBS on LFO-modulation and dystonic symptoms, and to investigate whether a difference in the resting-state LFO is present between DBS-naïve patients and patients with chronic DBS.
Methods:
seven patients were assessed during either DBS-implantation (n = 2) or battery replacement surgery (n = 5), and pseudorandomized in three conditions: no stimulation, cDBS, and aDBS. Additionally, resting-state LFP-recordings from patients undergoing battery replacement were compared to those obtained during DBS-implantation; LFP-recordings from a previous cohort of six dystonia patients undergoing DBS-implantation were incorporated into this analysis (total n = 8 newly implanted patients).
Results:
we corroborated that a mild LFO-suppression rapidly occurs during cDBS. However, no acute changes in clinical symptoms were observed after cDBS or aDBS. Remarkably, we observed that resting-state LFO were significantly lower in patients who had been effectively treated with chronic cDBS compared to those of newly implanted patients, even when stimulation was suspended.
Conclusions:
our results indicate that LFO-suppression in dystonia, similar to symptom response to cDBS, might be gradual, and remain after stimulation is suspended. Therefore, tracking gradual changes in LFO may be required for aDBS implementation.
More Related Videos
10:46Acute In Vivo Electrophysiological Recordings of Local Field Potentials and Multi-unit Activity from the Hyperdirect Pathway in Anesthetized Rats
Published on: June 22, 2017
09:46Analysis of Gene Expression Changes in the Rat Hippocampus After Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Thalamic Nucleus
Published on: March 8, 2015