Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
The optimal threshold for prompt clinical review: An external validation study of the national early warning score
Filip Haegdorens1, Koenraad G Monsieurs2, Koen De Meester1
1Department of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences, Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Aims And Objectives:
The aim of this study was to determine the optimal threshold for national early warning score in clinical practice.
Background:
The national early warning score is an aggregate early warning score aiming to predict patient mortality. Studies validating national early warning score did not use standardised patient outcomes or did not always include clinical workload in their results. Since all patients with a positive national early warning score require a clinical workup, it is crucial to determine the optimal threshold to limit false-positive alerts.
Design:
An external validation study using retrospectively collected data of patient admissions in six Belgian hospitals.
Methods:
We adhered to the STARD guideline for reporting. Two sample groups were selected: the cross-sectional sample (admitted patients, 1 day every 4 months) and the serious adverse event sample (all patients with unexpected death, cardiac arrest and unplanned admission to the intensive care unit). The maximum registered national early warning score value was collected in both groups. Predictive values were used as estimates for clinical workload.
Results:
We collected 1,523 in the cross-sectional sample and 390 patients in the serious adverse event sample. A national early warning score ≥5 had a predictive value of 6.8% and a negative predictive value of 99.5% to predict unexpected death, cardiac arrest with cardiopulmonary resuscitation or unplanned admission to intensive care (AUROC 0.841). The performance of national early warning score differed between outcome measures. Considering the predictive value, the optimal threshold for national early warning score is ≥5.
Conclusions:
We validated national early warning score to be applied in general hospital wards and confirmed the optimal threshold (≥5).
Relevance To Clinical Practice:
When a patient has a national early warning score <5, we may assume that in the next 24 hr this patient is less likely to die unexpectedly, receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation or be transferred to the ICU. Because of the significant number of false positives when national early warning score is ≥5, hospitals should create workable guidelines for clinical practice.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT