Outlier detection and influence diagnostics in network meta-analysis

Hisashi Noma1, Masahiko Gosho2, Ryota Ishii3

  • 1Department of Data Science, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan.

Research Synthesis Methods
|September 13, 2020
PubMed

Insights

This study introduces new methods to identify influential studies in network meta-analysis, crucial for accurate treatment comparisons. Detecting and removing outlying data prevents biased results and ensures reliable evidence synthesis.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • Pharmacological Research

Background:

  • Network meta-analysis (NMA) synthesizes multiple treatments but can be skewed by influential outlier studies.
  • Identifying and addressing these outliers is critical for unbiased and reliable NMA results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose novel frequentist methods for detecting outlying and influential studies within NMA.
  • To enhance the accuracy and trustworthiness of evidence synthesis in comparative effectiveness research.

Main Methods:

  • Developed four influence measures for NMA, including leave-one-trial-out cross-validation (comparison-specific studentized residual, relative change measures for covariance and heterogeneity matrices).
  • Proposed a model-based approach using a likelihood ratio statistic with a mean-shifted outlier detection model.
  • Applied methods to an NMA of antihypertensive drugs, including models with missing outcomes and adjusted degrees of freedom.

Main Results:

  • Successfully identified three influential trials in the antihypertensive drug NMA, including one retracted due to data falsification.
  • Demonstrated that omitting these influential studies significantly altered comparative efficacy estimates and drug rankings.
  • Validated the effectiveness of the proposed detection methods in a real-world NMA scenario.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed frequentist methods effectively detect outlying and influential studies in network meta-analysis.
  • Exclusion of identified influential studies can substantially change NMA outcomes, highlighting the importance of outlier detection.
  • These methods improve the reliability of evidence synthesis for clinical decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

Outliers and Influential Points01:08

Outliers and Influential Points

An outlier is an observation of data that does not fit the rest of the data. It is sometimes called an extreme value. When you graph an outlier, it will appear not to fit the pattern of the graph. Some outliers are due to mistakes (for example, writing down 50 instead of 500), while others may indicate that something unusual is happening. Outliers are present far from the least squares line in the vertical direction. They have large "errors," where the "error" or residual is the...
5.6K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
3.4K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.7K
What Are Outliers?01:12

What Are Outliers?

Outliers are observed data points that are far from the least squares line. They have unusual values and need to be examined carefully. Though an outlier may result from erroneous data, at other times, it may hold valuable information about the population under study and should be included in the data. Hence, it is crucial to examine what causes a data point to be an outlier.
The z score is used to find outliers or unusual values. It should be noted that any values beyond -2 and +2 are...
4.8K
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.7K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
9.9K