Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

An Application for Pairing with Wearable Devices to Monitor Personal Health Status
Published on: February 3, 2022
A validation study of a smartphone application for heart rate variability assessment in asymptomatic adults
Bruno Bavaresco Gambassi1,2, Victor Ribeiro Neves1,3, Einstein Zeus Alves Brito1,4
1Laboratório de Pesquisas em Desempenho Humano (LAPEDH), Universidade de Pernambuco (UPE) Petrolina, PE 56328-900, Brazil.
Background:
Assessment of heart rate variability (HRV) is an effective non-invasive tool to obtain data on cardiac autonomic modulation and may be assessed by a range of devices, including mobile applications. Objective: This study aimed to validate a smartphone application by comparing the R-R intervals (RRi) obtained by the app with a classic electrocardiogram (ECG)-derived reference condition Methods: Fifteen asymptomatic adults (24.9±3.4 years) underwent an orthostatic challenge during which RRi were simultaneously recorded by a freeware smartphone application and by an ECG recorder. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and coefficients of determination (r 2) were calculated to determine the degree of association between the two electronic devices. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance and Bland-Altman analysis were used to calculate the measurement consistency and agreement, respectively, between the two methods. Effect size was also used to estimate the magnitude of the differences.
Results:
The number of RRi from asymptomatic adults recorded by the ECG and by the free smartphone application was similar at rest in supine position (13,149 vs. 13,157; P = 0.432) and during orthostatic challenge (10,666 vs. 10,664 P = 0.532). RRi in milliseconds from both devices presented a near perfect correlation in the supine position (r = 0.999; Confidence Interval [CI] at 95%: 0.999-0.999; P < 0.0001) and during orthostatic challenge (r = 0.988; 95% CI: 0.988-0.989; P < 0.0001). A negative bias of -0.526 milliseconds (95% limits of agreement [LoA] from -4.319 to 3.266 milliseconds) was observed in supine position between ECG and the smartphone application. On the other hand, a positive bias of 0.077 milliseconds (95% LoA from -10.090 to 10.240 milliseconds) during the orthostatic challenge was observed.
Conclusions:
Our results cross-validated a freeware smartphone application with the ECG-derived reference condition for asymptomatic adults at rest in the supine position and during orthostatic challenge.
More Related Videos
05:51Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
Published on: February 21, 2025
08:12Calculating Heart Rate Variability from ECG Data from Youth with Cerebral Palsy During Active Video Game Sessions
Published on: June 5, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps: