Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Comparison of Annotation Services for Next-Generation Sequencing in a Large-Scale Precision Oncology Program
Evangelia Katsoulakis1, Jill E Duffy2, Bradley Hintze2,3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, James A. Haley Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Tampa, FL.
Annotation services for next-generation sequencing (NGS) genomic variants show significant variability in determining pathogenicity and clinical actionability. Improving NGS variant annotation precision is crucial for advancing precision medicine in oncology.
Area of Science:
- Genomic Medicine
- Oncology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Next-generation sequencing (NGS) multigene panel testing is increasingly utilized in precision oncology programs, such as the Veterans Affairs National Precision Oncology Program (NPOP).
- Interpreting the vast number of genomic alterations identified by NGS remains a significant challenge for implementing precision medicine effectively.
- Standardized and reliable annotation of these variants is essential for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the concordance of pathogenicity determination and clinical actionability assessments provided by different annotation services within the NPOP.
- To identify potential bottlenecks in the interpretation of genomic alterations from NGS data.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of annotations for unique gene variants from NGS panel results across three services: N-of-One (NoO), IBM Watson for Genomics (WfG), and OncoKB.
- Assessment of concordance for pathogenicity (all three services) and Level 1 drug actionability (WfG and OncoKB) using Cohen's kappa statistic.
Main Results:
- Analysis of 1,388 unique variants from 1,227 NGS results revealed low agreement in pathogenicity assessment between services (e.g., WfG and NoO: 30% agreement, kappa -0.26).
- Moderate agreement was observed for Level 1 therapeutic actionability between WfG and OncoKB (96.9% agreement, kappa 0.44), with significant discrepancies in identified actionable targets.
- TP53, STK11, and CDKN2A were among the most frequently mutated genes, with lung adenocarcinoma being the predominant cancer type.
Conclusions:
- Substantial variability exists in the pathogenicity assessment of NGS variants in solid tumors across different annotation services.
- Agreement on Level 1 therapeutic actionability recommendations between WfG and OncoKB was only moderate, highlighting inconsistencies in clinical guidance.
- There is a critical need to enhance the precision and consistency of NGS multigene panel variant annotation to support effective precision oncology.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Genome Annotation and Assembly
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Sanger Sequencing

