Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Statins Use and Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients after Systemic Thrombolysis
Ashkan Mowla1, Harshit Shah2, Navdeep Singh Lail2
1Division of Endovascular Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, California, USA, mowla@usc.edu.
Insights
Prior statin use did not significantly impact symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) or outcomes after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treatment with IV thrombolysis (IVT). Statin intensity also showed no significant effect on sICH risk or outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of disability and mortality.
- Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is a critical treatment for AIS, but carries risks like symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).
- Statins are commonly used to manage cardiovascular risk factors, but their effect on AIS outcomes post-IVT is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of prior statin use on the risk of sICH after IVT for AIS.
- To evaluate the association between statin intensity (high vs. low) and sICH risk and patient outcomes.
- To determine if statin therapy influences functional outcomes, measured by the modified Rankin Scale, following IVT for AIS.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 834 patients treated with IVT for AIS over a 10-year period.
- Patients were categorized into statin users and non-users, and statin users were further classified by intensity (high vs. low).
- Outcomes, including sICH and discharge modified Rankin Scale scores, were compared across groups using multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for relevant clinical factors.
Main Results:
- No significant association was found between any statin use and the odds of sICH (OR = 0.52, p = 0.06) or poor outcome (OR = 1.01, p = 0.57).
- High-intensity statin use showed a trend towards reduced odds of poor outcome (OR = 0.53, p = 0.01) compared to low-intensity statins, but this did not reach statistical significance in multivariate analysis (OR = 0.60, p = 0.07).
- Statin intensity did not significantly affect the odds of sICH compared to low-intensity statins (OR = 0.39, p = 0.15).
Conclusions:
- Prior statin therapy does not appear to significantly increase the risk of sICH or negatively impact outcomes after IVT for AIS.
- Statin intensity did not demonstrate a significant association with sICH risk or functional outcomes in this cohort.
- Further research may be warranted to explore potential benefits of high-intensity statins on functional recovery post-AIS, although current findings require cautious interpretation due to loss of significance in multivariate models.
Aim:
The aim of this was to study the effects of statins and their intensity on symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and outcome after IV thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and cerebrovascular images of all the patients treated with IVT for AIS in our center in a 10-year period. Patients were further characterized as any statin users versus non-users on admission to the emergency department. Statins were categorized in high intensity or low intensity statin based on its propensity to reduce lower low-density cholesterol by ≥45% or <45%, respectively. Safety and discharge modified Rankin Score were compared between statin users versus non-users and also between high-intensity versus low-intensity groups.
Results:
A total of 834 patients received IVT for AIS in our center during a 10-year period. Multivariate models were adjusted for age, NIH Stroke Scale at admission, INR, and history of DM and atrial fibrillation. There was no association between odds of sICH and any statin use (OR = 0.52 [0.26-1.03], p = 0.06). In multivariate model, any statin use was not associated with odds of poor outcome (Table 4: OR = 1.01 [0.79-1.55], p = 0.57). There was no significant association between odds of sICH among patients on high-intensity statin compared to low intensity statin (multivariate model OR = 0.39 [0.11-1.40], p = 0.15). There was 47% reduced odds of poor outcome among patients on high-intensity statin as compared to low-intensity statin (OR = 0.53[0.32-0.88] p = 0.01). However, this significant association was lost in the multivariate model (OR = 0.60 [0.35-1.05], p = 0.07).
Conclusion:
Our study does not show any significant association between risk of sICH and poor outcome after IVT for patients on prior statin therapy. We also did not find significant association between the risk of sICH and poor outcome after IVT and the intensity of the stain used.
Related Concept Videos
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

