Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Risk Stratification for Patients with Chest Pain Discharged Home from the Emergency Department
Peter A Kavsak1, Joshua O Cerasuolo2, Shawn E Mondoux3
1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University and Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, 711 Concession Street Hamilton, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada.
Insights
A new clinical chemistry score (CCS) effectively risk stratifies low-risk chest pain patients discharged from the emergency department. This score, using glucose, kidney function, and troponin levels, identifies patients needing different medical care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Emergency Medicine
Background:
- Risk stratification for chest pain patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) is challenging.
- The utility of additional laboratory tests for improving risk assessment in low-risk patients is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effectiveness of a clinical chemistry score (CCS) for risk stratification.
- To evaluate the CCS's ability to predict adverse outcomes in chest pain patients discharged from the ED.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 14,676 chest pain patients discharged from the ED in Ontario, Canada, was analyzed.
- The CCS, incorporating plasma glucose, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin, was used.
- Cox proportional hazard models assessed the primary outcome (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina) at 30, 90, and 365 days.
Main Results:
- At 30 days, the primary outcome occurred in 0.3% (CCS < 2), 0.9% (CCS = 2), and 2.3% (CCS > 2) of patients (p < 0.001).
- At 90 days, adjusted hazard ratios for the composite outcome were 0.51 (CCS < 2) and 2.80 (CCS > 2).
- At 365 days, the composite outcome rates were 1.3% (CCS < 2), 3.4% (CCS = 2), and 11.1% (CCS > 2) (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- The CCS effectively risk stratifies chest pain patients discharged from the ED.
- The score identifies both low- and high-risk patients.
- These identified risk groups may benefit from tailored medical management.
Abstract:
For patients with chest pain who are deemed clinically to be low risk and discharged home from the emergency department (ED), it is unclear whether further laboratory tests can improve risk stratification. Here, we investigated the utility of a clinical chemistry score (CCS), which comprises plasma glucose, the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (I or T) to generate a common score for risk stratification. In a cohort of 14,676 chest pain patients in the province of Ontario, Canada and who were discharged home from the ED (November 2012-February 2013 and April 2013-September 2015) we evaluated the CCS as a risk stratification tool for all-cause mortality, plus hospitalization for myocardial infarction or unstable angina (primary outcome) at 30, 90, and 365 days post-discharge using Cox proportional hazard models. At 30 days the primary outcome occurred in 0.3% of patients with a CCS < 2 (n = 6404), 0.9% of patients with a CCS = 2 (n = 4336), and 2.3% of patients with a CCS > 2 (n = 3936) (p < 0.001). At 90 days, patients with CCS < 2 (median age = 52y (IQR = 46-60), 59.4% female) had an adjusted HR = 0.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.32-0.82) for the composite outcome and patients with a CCS > 2 (median age = 74y (IQR = 64-82), 48.0% female) had an adjusted HR = 2.80 (95%CI = 1.98-3.97). At 365 days, 1.3%, 3.4%, and 11.1% of patients with a CCS < 2, 2, or >2 respectively, had the composite outcome (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the CCS can risk stratify chest pain patients discharged home from the ED and identifies both low- and high-risk patients who may warrant different medical care.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation