Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

6.0K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
6.0K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.5K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.5K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.4K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.5K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.5K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.2K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.2K
Binomial Probability Distribution01:15

Binomial Probability Distribution

14.8K
A binomial distribution is a probability distribution for a procedure with a fixed number of trials, where each trial can have only two outcomes.
The outcomes of a binomial experiment fit a binomial probability distribution. A statistical experiment can be classified as a binomial experiment if the following conditions are met:
There are a fixed number of trials. Think of trials as repetitions of an experiment. The letter n denotes the number of trials.
There are only two possible outcomes,...
14.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On Quantum Ergodicity for Higher Dimensional Cat Maps.

Communications in mathematical physics·2025
Same author

Enhanced Majorana stability in a three-site Kitaev chain.

Nature nanotechnology·2025
Same author

Lyrics do matter: how "coping songs" relate to well-being goals. The COVID pandemic case.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Robust poor man's Majorana zero modes using Yu-Shiba-Rusinov states.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

A two-site Kitaev chain in a two-dimensional electron gas.

Nature·2024
Same author

Crossed Andreev Reflection and Elastic Cotunneling in Three Quantum Dots Coupled by Superconductors.

Physical review letters·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.8K

Modelling the expected probability of correct assignment under uncertainty.

Tom Dvir1,2, Renana Peres3, Zeév Rudnick4

  • 1Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University, 91904, Jerusalem, Israel.

Scientific Reports
|September 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decision uncertainty leads to significant mismatches in choices like health insurance. Optimal assistance focuses on individuals near decision boundaries, not directly on them, to improve outcomes.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.8K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Decision science
  • Operations research
  • Behavioral economics

Background:

  • Individuals often face uncertainty when making complex choices, such as selecting health insurance or educational institutions.
  • This uncertainty can lead to suboptimal decisions, where the chosen option does not align with true preferences, resulting in a mismatch.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of decision-making uncertainty on optimal matching from a central planner's perspective.
  • To quantify the probability of a correct match and the average percentage of matches under varying uncertainty levels.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing Voronoi tessellations to model individuals and alternatives within an attribute space.
  • Analytical and numerical calculations to determine the probability of correct matches and average match percentages.
  • Investigating the influence of uncertainty levels and spatial location on decision outcomes.

Main Results:

  • A considerable overall mismatch rate was observed, even with low levels of uncertainty.
  • The probability of a correct match and the average percentage of matches were calculated and analyzed.
  • The study found that the optimal allocation of assistance is for individuals situated near, but not directly on, the boundaries between decision regions.

Conclusions:

  • Decision-making uncertainty poses a significant challenge, leading to substantial mismatches that warrant policy maker attention.
  • Effective resource allocation for decision support should target individuals at the periphery of choice boundaries.
  • The findings provide insights for optimizing decision support systems and policy interventions in areas with high uncertainty.