Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Collagen-based Scaffold Supports Tendon-to-bone Healing After Rotator Cuff Repair: An Integrated Translational Study.

Advanced healthcare materials·2026
Same author

Evaluating the Effects of Poly(ε-Caprolactone)-Nanohydroxyapatite Composition on 3D-Printed Scaffold Structural Properties.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2026
Same author

Topographical design principles for osteochondral tissue engineering.

Bioactive materials·2026
Same author

Comparison of innovative medical devices between China and the United States.

Regenerative biomaterials·2026
Same author

Bone matrix-inspired whitlockite porous ceramic with effects of autophagy activation contributes to bone regeneration.

Bioactive materials·2026
Same author

3DSeqCheck: A Web-based Tool for Verifying Sequence Consistency Between a 3D Structure File and the Corresponding UniProt Entry.

Journal of molecular biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer
07:05

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer

Published on: September 22, 2015

10.4K

Machine Learning-Guided Three-Dimensional Printing of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Anja Conev1, Eleni E Litsa1, Marissa R Perez2,3

  • 1Department of Computer Science and Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.

Tissue Engineering. Part A
|September 17, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning models can predict 3D printing quality for tissue engineering scaffolds. This approach reduces the need for extensive experimentation, optimizing material and printing parameter selection.

Keywords:
3D printingbiomaterialsmachine learningprinting quality predictionrandom foreststissue engineering

More Related Videos

Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures
05:52

Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures

Published on: September 27, 2019

9.8K
Human Cartilage Tissue Fabrication Using Three-dimensional Inkjet Printing Technology
09:32

Human Cartilage Tissue Fabrication Using Three-dimensional Inkjet Printing Technology

Published on: June 10, 2014

16.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer
07:05

Viability of Bioprinted Cellular Constructs Using a Three Dispenser Cartesian Printer

Published on: September 22, 2015

10.4K
Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures
05:52

Core/shell Printing Scaffolds For Tissue Engineering Of Tubular Structures

Published on: September 27, 2019

9.8K
Human Cartilage Tissue Fabrication Using Three-dimensional Inkjet Printing Technology
09:32

Human Cartilage Tissue Fabrication Using Three-dimensional Inkjet Printing Technology

Published on: June 10, 2014

16.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Engineering
  • Additive Manufacturing
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • 3D printing enables scaffold fabrication for tissue engineering using diverse materials.
  • Optimizing printing conditions for new materials is experimentally intensive and costly.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a Machine Learning (ML) framework to predict 3D print quality based on material composition and printing parameters.
  • To differentiate between printing configurations yielding low-quality versus promising prints for tissue engineering scaffolds.
  • To lay the groundwork for a recommendation system for optimal 3D printing conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated two ML approaches: direct classification and indirect regression, both using Random Forests.
  • Trained and evaluated models on a dataset from a previous extrusion-based 3D printing study of porous polymer scaffolds.
  • Input features included material composition and printing parameters; output was predicted print quality (low/high).

Main Results:

  • Both Random Forest-based ML models accurately classified the majority of tested printing configurations.
  • A simpler linear ML model proved ineffective for predicting print quality.
  • Analysis indicated data redundancies in full factorial designs for ML applications.

Conclusions:

  • ML, specifically Random Forests, is effective in predicting 3D printing quality for tissue engineering scaffolds.
  • The study highlights the potential for ML to guide the selection of printing parameters, reducing experimental effort.
  • A more efficient data collection strategy is proposed to optimize ML model training for 3D printing applications.