Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hair Cells01:22

Hair Cells

43.8K
Hair cells are the sensory receptors of the auditory system—they transduce mechanical sound waves into electrical energy that the nervous system can understand. Hair cells are located in the organ of Corti within the cochlea of the inner ear, between the basilar and tectorial membranes. The actual sensory receptors are called inner hair cells. The outer hair cells serve other functions, such as sound amplification in the cochlea, and are not discussed in detail here.
43.8K
The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

49.6K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
49.6K
Electrodes: Overview01:17

Electrodes: Overview

2.4K
 Electrochemical measurements are conducted in an electrochemical cell composed of various components that control and measure the current and potential. One fundamental component is electrodes, conductive materials that enable electron transfer reactions at their surfaces.
There are two main types of electrodes in electrochemical cells. The first type, known as the working or indicator electrode, has a potential that is sensitive to the analyte's concentration and reacts to changes in...
2.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Specific gut microbiome and metabolome changes in patients with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and comparison between patients with different dialysis vintages.

Frontiers in medicine·2024
Same author

Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B·2024
Same author

Assessing psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Sleep Quality Questionnaire among healthcare students.

BMC psychology·2024
Same author

Sema3A secreted by sensory nerve induces bone formation under mechanical loads.

International journal of oral science·2024
Same author

Sleep quality and subjective well-being in healthcare students: examining the role of anxiety and depression.

Frontiers in public health·2024
Same author

Exosomes Derived from hucMSCs Primed with IFN-γ Suppress the NF-κB Signal Pathway in LPS-Induced ALI by Modulating the miR-199b-5p/AFTPH Axis.

Cell biochemistry and biophysics·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.5K

Investigating the Electrical Properties of Different Cochlear Implants.

Nol Swaddiwudhipong1, Chen Jiang2, Thomas G Landry3

  • 1School of Clinical Medicine.

Otology & Neurotology : Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [And] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
|September 17, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Different cochlear implant designs show similar electrical performance and current spread, suggesting electrode configuration has minimal impact. Surgical rotation during implantation also does not significantly alter implant impedance properties.

More Related Videos

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

4.8K
Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

14.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.5K
Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

4.8K
Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

14.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Otolaryngology
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Cochlear implants (CIs) face limitations due to current spread, impacting spectral resolution for auditory nerve stimulation.
  • Variations in CI electrode design (size, shape, number, configuration) exist, but their impact on current spread is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize and compare electrical properties and current spread of four different cochlear implant designs.
  • To investigate the effect of electrode orientation on CI electrical performance.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a 3D-printed artificial cochlear model with recording electrodes.
  • Performed biphasic monopolar stimulation and recorded transimpedance matrix (TIM) data.
  • Examined effects of 180-degree electrode rotation and performed impedance spectroscopy at different cochlear locations.

Main Results:

  • All four cochlear implant designs exhibited similar TIM profiles and waveforms.
  • Rotating implants by 180 degrees had minimal impact on TIM profiles.
  • Impedance spectroscopy revealed broad similarities in amplitude and phase, with some differences in specific electrical parameters.

Conclusions:

  • Cochlear implant designs with varying electrode configurations show comparable electrical performance.
  • Surgical maneuvers like rotating the implant are unlikely to significantly alter impedance properties.