Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
No Apparent Influence of Nonadherence on Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients
Sumit R M Gokoel1, Tom C Zwart2, Dirk Jan A R Moes2
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; and.
Background:
High intrapatient variability (IPV) in tacrolimus exposure has been associated with an increased risk of graft rejection and graft loss. It has been suggested that medication nonadherence has high impact on IPV. The objective of this study is to assess the relationship between tacrolimus IPV and medication nonadherence in stable kidney transplant recipients.
Methods:
This study was conducted within the Reducing Renal Function Deterioration trial (Netherlands Trial Register: NTR7256), which included stable kidney transplant recipients. Nonadherence was assessed quantitatively by electronic monitoring (EM) and qualitatively using the composite adherence score (CAS) consisting of patient self-reporting (Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Scale), a physician report, and the tacrolimus trough concentrations (C0). IPV in tacrolimus C0 and area under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) was evaluated at 5 and 3 sampling instances, respectively.
Results:
Data of 64 kidney transplant recipients (43 males, 21 females; mean age 53.6 years), mean time post-transplantation 5.4 years, were collected. Mean missed tacrolimus intake was 7% (0.3%-13.4%) based on EM, missing one intake every 2 weeks. Based on the CAS, 68.9% of the patients were categorized as nonadherent. The mean IPV was 17.9% (4.4%-65.3%) and 20.2% (2.5%-51.6%) for tacrolimus C0 and AUCs, respectively. The nonadherence data displayed a nonparametric distribution, with nonadherence scores mostly in the lower ranges. There was no significant difference in the mean IPV between adherent and nonadherent patients. There were no differences in EM, CAS, physician report, or time-in-therapeutic range, but patients with a low AUC IPV showed a slightly higher Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Scale score than those with a high AUC IPV (P = 0.035).
Conclusions:
There was no apparent relationship between IPV and nonadherence in this motivated kidney transplant recipient population, with one missed tacrolimus dose every 2 weeks.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Renal Failure: Dose Adjustments
Reduced renal clearance and elimination rate are common outcomes of renal impairment. These alterations lead to a prolonged elimination half-life and an altered apparent volume of distribution for drugs. As a result, dosage adjustments are typically necessary to maintain optimal drug levels in the body.
However, dosage adjustments...
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors

