Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Accuracy of weight estimation methods in adults, adolescents and children: a prospective study
Giles N Cattermole1,2, Appolinaire Manirafasha3,4
1Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Rwanda College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Kigali, Rwanda giles@cattermole.org.uk.
Insights
Accurate weight estimation is crucial in emergencies. The PAWPER XL-MAC tape and patient/guardian estimates proved most reliable for all age groups, outperforming traditional methods.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Clinical Assessment
- Global Health
Background:
- Accurate patient weight estimation is vital in emergency and low-resource settings.
- Existing paediatric weight estimation methods like PAWPER and Mercy tapes lack validation in adults.
- Standardized adult weight estimation methods are currently unavailable.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of various weight estimation methods across all age groups (paediatric, adolescent, adult).
- To compare the efficacy of PAWPER and Mercy tape methods against direct estimates in a diverse patient population.
- To identify the most reliable methods for weight estimation in settings where direct weighing is not feasible.
Main Methods:
- Prospective recruitment of 947 participants (307 children, 309 adolescents, 331 adults) in Kigali, Rwanda.
- Weight estimation using PAWPER (height & MAC) and Mercy (MAC & humeral length) methods.
- Comparison of estimated weights against actual weights, with primary outcome as proportion within 20% (p20).
Main Results:
- PAWPER XL-MAC and guardian/participant estimates demonstrated high accuracy across all age groups.
- In children, guardian estimates (90.2%) and PAWPER XL-MAC (89.3%) were most accurate.
- In adults, participant estimates (98.5%) and PAWPER XL-MAC (83.7%) showed the best performance.
Conclusions:
- PAWPER XL-MAC and guardian/participant weight estimates are reliable for all ages in emergency/low-resource settings.
- Traditional age-based formulae performed poorly in children.
- This study provides the first adult validation of PAWPER and Mercy methods, recommending their clinical use.
Introduction:
Weight estimation of both adult and paediatric patients is often necessary in emergency or low-resource settings when it is not possible to weigh the patient. There are many methods for paediatric weight estimation, but no standard methods for adults. PAWPER and Mercy tapes are used in children, but have not been assessed in adults. The primary aim of this study was to assess weight estimation methods in patients of all ages.
Methods:
Patients were prospectively recruited from emergency and outpatient departments in Kigali, Rwanda. Participants (or guardians) were asked to estimate weight. Investigators collected weight, height, mid-arm circumference (MAC) and humeral-length data. In all participants, estimates of weight were calculated from height and MAC (PAWPER methods), MAC and humeral length (Mercy method). In children, Broselow measurements and age-based formulae were also used. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of estimates within 20% of actual weight (p20).
Results:
We recruited 947 participants: 307 children, 309 adolescents and 331 adults. For p20, the best methods were: in children, guardian estimate (90.2%) and PAWPER XL-MAC (89.3%); in adolescents, PAWPER XL-MAC (91.3%) and guardian estimate (90.9%); in adults, participant estimate (98.5%) and PAWPER XL-MAC (83.7%). In all age groups, there was a trend of decreasing weight estimation with increasing actual weight.
Conclusion:
This prospective study of weight estimation methods across all age groups is the first adult study of PAWPER and Mercy methods. In children, age-based rules performed poorly. In patients of all ages, the PAWPER XL-MAC and guardian/participant estimates of weight were the most reliable and we would recommend their use in this setting.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
What are Estimates?
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients

