Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
Re-evaluating the Role of CABG in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Douglas Farmer1,2,3, Ernesto Jimenez4,5,6
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. douglas.farmer@bcm.edu.
Insights
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) offers survival advantages over percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients long-term. Careful patient selection by a heart team is crucial for optimal revascularization strategy and outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) use has declined in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use increasing.
- Long-term data indicates superior survival rates for CABG compared to PCI in specific ACS populations.
- Understanding current indications and outcomes for CABG in ACS is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current indications for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
- To evaluate the outcomes of CABG in patients with ACS.
- To compare the long-term effectiveness of CABG versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ACS management.
Main Methods:
- Review of real-world studies and clinical data comparing CABG and PCI outcomes in ACS.
- Analysis of patient selection criteria and the impact of interdisciplinary heart team decisions.
- Evaluation of outcomes in specific ACS subgroups, including those with cardiogenic shock.
Main Results:
- Real-world evidence suggests better long-term outcomes with CABG than PCI following non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS).
- Staged CABG after culprit-vessel PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a viable strategy for selected patients.
- Mechanical circulatory support in CABG for ACS with cardiogenic shock showed a significant mortality reduction.
Conclusions:
- The optimal revascularization strategy post-ACS is multifactorial and patient-specific.
- Careful patient selection, guided by an interdisciplinary heart team, is paramount for improving outcomes.
- Despite declining use, CABG remains a critical option with long-term survival benefits for select ACS patients.
Purpose Of Review:
The use of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has markedly declined during the past decade, with an increase in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, long-term data continues to show survival advantages for patients undergoing CABG over PCI. We describe the current indications for and outcomes of CABG in patients who present with ACS.
Recent Findings:
Real-world studies demonstrate better long-term outcomes with CABG than with PCI after NSTE-ACS. Staged CABG after culprit-vessel PCI for STEMI is also a feasible option in certain patients. In patients presenting with ACS and cardiogenic shock who are treated with CABG, the use of mechanical circulatory support has produced a limited but significant reduction in mortality. The optimal revascularization strategy after ACS depends on many variables. The pre-eminent factor in selecting the best mode of revascularization and improving outcomes is careful patient selection based on deliberation by an interdisciplinary heart team.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations

