Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Neural Circuits01:25

Neural Circuits

2.4K
Neural circuits and neuronal pools are two of the main structures found in the nervous system. Neural circuits are networks of neurons that work together to carry out a specific task or process. They consist of interconnected neurons and glial cells, which provide structural and metabolic support.
Neuronal pools are collections of nerve cells with similar functions and interact through chemical and electrical signals. These pools include both interneurons (the central neural circuit nodes that...
2.4K
Neural Regulation01:37

Neural Regulation

42.6K
Digestion begins with a cephalic phase that prepares the digestive system to receive food. When our brain processes visual or olfactory information about food, it triggers impulses in the cranial nerves innervating the salivary glands and stomach to prepare for food.
42.6K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

200
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
200
Network Function of a Circuit01:25

Network Function of a Circuit

512
Frequency response analysis in electrical circuits provides vital insights into a circuit's behavior as the frequency of the input signal changes. The transfer function, a mathematical tool, is instrumental in understanding this behavior. It defines the relationship between phasor output and input and comes in four types: voltage gain, current gain, transfer impedance, and transfer admittance. The critical components of the transfer function are the poles and zeros.
512

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scale-invariant evolution: Comment on "homo informatio" by Michael Walker.

Physics of life reviews·2026
Same author

The body does not keep the score: trauma, predictive coding, and the restoration of metastability.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2026
Same author

The dysconnection hypothesis of schizophrenia: a 30-year update.

World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)·2026
Same author

The methodological foundations of lesion network mapping remain sound.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Insula Structure Is Linked to Autonomic Cardiac Dysregulation in Depression.

Biological psychiatry·2026
Same author

Correction: Dynamic causal models in infectious disease epidemiology-an assessment of their predictive validity based on the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK 2020 to 2024.

Frontiers in public health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.7K

Reverse-Engineering Neural Networks to Characterize Their Cost Functions.

Takuya Isomura1, Karl Friston2

  • 1Brain Intelligence Theory Unit, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan takuya.isomura@riken.jp.

Neural Computation
|September 18, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that biologically plausible neural network cost functions act as variational bounds, enabling neural activity and plasticity to perform Bayesian inference and learning by maximizing model evidence. This links neural network hyperparameters to variational free energy optimization.

More Related Videos

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

410
Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches
09:47

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

10.7K
Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

410
Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches
09:47

Author Spotlight: Advancing Alzheimer's Research – Exploring Early Detection and Multi-Omics Approaches

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.5K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning Theory

Background:

  • Neural networks utilize cost functions to guide learning.
  • Biologically plausible models require cost functions that align with neural activity and plasticity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate biologically plausible cost functions in neural networks.
  • To establish a formal link between neural network cost functions and variational free energy.
  • To demonstrate how neural activity and plasticity relate to Bayesian inference and learning.

Main Methods:

  • Formulating cost functions minimized by both neural activity and plasticity.
  • Utilizing generative models based on partially observed Markov decision processes (POMDP).
  • Applying mathematical and numerical analyses to establish theoretical equivalence.

Main Results:

  • Cost functions are shown to be a variational bound on model evidence.
  • Neural activity and plasticity perform Bayesian inference and learning, respectively, by maximizing model evidence.
  • Formal equivalence is established between neural network cost functions and variational free energy under specific prior beliefs.

Conclusions:

  • Neural network cost functions can be interpreted within a Bayesian inference framework.
  • Optimal encoding of latent states is achieved when network priors match input-generating processes.
  • This equivalence allows for hyperparameter optimization via variational free energy minimization and formal characterization of neural networks.