Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Noninvasive Sampling of Mucosal Lining Fluid for the Quantification of In Vivo Upper Airway Immune-mediator Levels
Published on: August 7, 2017
Variation in Early Inflammatory Marker Testing for Infection-Related Hospitalizations in Children
Jessica L Markham1,2, Cary W Thurm3, Matt Hall4,3
1Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City and School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri; jlmarkham@cmh.edu.
Insights
Inflammatory marker testing varies widely in children
Area of Science:
- Pediatric healthcare research
- Clinical diagnostics
- Healthcare quality improvement
Background:
- Inflammatory marker testing, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), is a common diagnostic tool in pediatric infections.
- Concerns exist regarding the potential overuse of these tests in children's hospitals.
- Understanding testing variation is crucial for optimizing diagnostic practices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the variation in early inflammatory marker testing for infection-related hospitalizations among children's hospitals.
- To investigate the association between testing rates and key hospital outcomes: length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rates, and costs.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study analyzed data from 55,771 infection-related hospitalizations in children (0-17 years) across 48 children's hospitals.
- Hospitals were categorized into three groups based on adjusted early inflammatory marker testing rates (CRP or ESR) using k-means clustering.
- Multivariable regression models assessed the relationship between hospital testing groups and patient outcomes.
Main Results:
- Early inflammatory marker testing occurred in 14.3% of hospitalizations.
- Significant variation in testing rates was observed across hospitals and infection types.
- Hospitals with higher testing rates (Group A) had significantly longer adjusted LOS compared to lower-testing groups (B and C), but no differences in readmission rates or costs were found.
Conclusions:
- Wide variation exists in pediatric inflammatory marker testing practices across children's hospitals.
- Hospitals demonstrating higher testing rates for one infection tend to exhibit higher rates for others, suggesting a pattern of diagnostic intensity.
- These findings highlight opportunities for implementing diagnostic stewardship programs to optimize the use of inflammatory markers and potentially reduce length of stay.
Background And Objectives:
Inflammatory marker testing in children has been identified as a potential area of overuse. We sought to describe variation in early inflammatory marker (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) testing for infection-related hospitalizations across children's hospitals and to determine its association with length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission rate, and cost.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional study of children aged 0 to 17 years with infection-related hospitalizations using the Pediatric Health Information System. After adjusting for patient characteristics, we examined rates of inflammatory marker testing (C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate) during the first 2 days of hospitalization. We used k-means clustering to assign each hospital to 1 of 3 groups on the basis of similarities in adjusted diagnostic testing rates across 12 infectious conditions. Multivariable regression was used to examine the association between hospital testing group and outcomes.
Results:
We included 55 771 hospitalizations from 48 hospitals. In 7945 (14.3%), there was inflammatory marker testing in the first 2 days of hospitalization. We observed wide variation in inflammatory marker testing rates across hospitals and infections. Group A hospitals tended to perform more tests than group B or C hospitals (37.4% vs 18.0% vs 10.4%; P < .001) and had the longest adjusted LOS (3.2 vs 2.9 vs 2.8 days; P = .01). There was no significant difference in adjusted 30-day readmission rates or costs.
Conclusions:
Inflammatory marker testing varied widely across hospitals. Hospitals with higher inflammatory testing for one infection tend to test more frequently for other infections and have longer LOS, suggesting opportunities for diagnostic stewardship.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Interpreting Run Charts
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis

