Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

05:48
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
Published on: August 9, 2024
1.9K
Hey Siri: How Effective are Common Voice Recognition Systems at Recognizing Dysphonic Voices?
Matthew L Rohlfing1, Daniel P Buckley1,2, Jacquelyn Piraquive1
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boston Medical Center Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
The Laryngoscope
|September 19, 2020
Summary
Voice recognition systems struggle with dysphonic voices, showing significantly lower word recognition scores compared to non-dysphonic voices. This highlights a need to improve accessibility for individuals with voice disorders.
Area of Science:
- Speech and Hearing Sciences
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Voice recognition technology is increasingly integrated into daily life.
- Individuals with voice disorders face challenges interacting with these systems.
- This can negatively impact their quality of life and independence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the transcription accuracy of common voice recognition systems for dysphonic voices.
- To compare the performance of different voice recognition platforms (Apple iPhone 6S™, Apple iPhone 11 Pro™, Google Voice™).
- To assess the correlation between voice disorder severity and transcription accuracy.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study involving participants with (n=30) and without (n=23) voice disorders.
- Participants read the "Rainbow Passage," and recordings were processed by voice recognition software.
- Word recognition scores were calculated and compared with auditory-perceptual and acoustic measures.
Main Results:
- Significantly lower mean word recognition scores were observed for dysphonic voices across all tested systems (68.6%-71.2%) compared to non-dysphonic voices (91.9%-93.8%).
- Strong negative correlations were found between the severity of dysphonia (CAPE-V ratings) and word recognition scores (R²=0.609-0.670).
- These correlations remained significant even after controlling for demographic and acoustic variables.
Conclusions:
- Current voice recognition systems exhibit poor transcription accuracy for individuals with dysphonic voices.
- Perceptual voice evaluation strongly correlates with the performance of these technologies.
- The findings underscore the necessity of considering the needs of patients with voice disorders in the development of voice-activated technologies.

