Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Traction Microscopy Integrated with Microfluidics for Chemotactic Collective Migration
Published on: October 13, 2019
A Cellular Potts energy-based approach to analyse the influence of the surface topography on single cell motility
Thomas Thenard1, Anita Catapano2, Michel Mesnard3
1Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, IBHGC, HESAM Université, F-75013 Paris, France; Bordeaux INP, Université de Bordeaux, Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, CNRS, INRA, HESAM Université, I2M UMR 5295, F-33405 Talence, France.
Abstract:
The surface shape is an important aspect to take into account to ensure the success of an implant. At the cellular scale level, the cell behaviour, especially its migration, is affected by the specificities of the surface of the substrate, such as the stiffness of the surface and its roughness topography. The latter has been shown to have a great impact on various cell mechanisms, such as the cell adhesion, migration, or proliferation. In fact, the mere presence of micro roughness leads to an improvement of those mechanisms, with a better integration of the implants. However, the phenomena behind those improvements are still not clear. In this paper, we propose a three-dimensional (3D) model of a single cell migration using a Cellular Potts (CP) model to study the influence of the surface topography on cell motility. To do so, various configurations were tested, such as: (i) a substrate with a random roughness, (ii) a substrate with a rectangular groove pattern (parallel and perpendicular to the direction of motion), (ii) a substrate with a sinusoidal groove pattern. To evaluate the influence of the surface topography on cell motility, for each configuration, the cell speed and shape as well as the contact surface between the cell and the substrate have been quantified. Our numerical results demonstrate that, in agreement with the experimental observations of the literature, the substrate topography has an influence on the cell efficiency (i.e. cell speed), orientation and shape. Besides, we also show that the increase of the contact surface alone in presence of roughness is not enough to explain the improvement of cell migration on the various rough surfaces. Finally, we highlight the importance of the roughness dimension on cell motility. This could be a critical aspect to consider for further analyses and applications, such as surface treatments for medical applications.
Related Concept Videos
Actin Polymerization and Cell Motility
Actin cytoskeleton dynamics can produce pushing, pulling, and resistance forces that help the cell to migrate....
Cell Migration
Chemotaxis and Direction of Cell Migration
Microtubules in Cell Motility
Cell Motility through Blebbing
Blebbing Through the Matrix
In multicellular...
Role of Myosin in Cell Migration
Myosin II is a hexamer comprising two heavy chains with globular heads and coiled-coil tails, two regulatory light chains, and two essential light chains. The ATPase sites on the myosin heads hydrolyze ATP, and the released phosphate generates the force for contraction....

