Comparison of Knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction (IMR) with Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction (iDose4)
Chinmay Bhimaji Kulkarni1, Sreekumar Karumathil Pullara1, Nirmal Kumar Prabhu1
1Department of Radiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Cochin, Kerala, India.
Rationale And Objectives:
To compare tumor conspicuity of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and image quality on knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction low-dose computed tomography (IMR-LDCT) with hybrid iterative reconstruction standard-dose CT (iDose4-SDCT).
Methods:
Thirty-two patients (mean age 61.9 ± 9.7 years; male:female 27:5; mean body mass index 25.6 ± 3.8 kg/m2) with cirrhosis and 40 HCCs in IMR-LDCT group and 33 patients (mean age 60.1 ± 7.4 years; male:female 28:5; body mass index 26.7 ± 3.2 kg/m2) with cirrhosis and 40 HCCs in iDose4-SDCT group were included in this retrospective study. Objective analysis of reconstructed iDose4 and IMR images was done for contrast-to-noise ratio of HCCs (CNRHCC), image noise, signal-to-noise ratio of portal vein (SNRPV), and inferior vena cava (SNRIVC). Subjective analysis of tumor conspicuity and image quality was done by two independent reviewers in a blinded manner. Mean volume CT dose index, dose length product, and effective dose for both groups were compared.
Results:
The CNRHCC was significantly higher in IMR-LDCT compared to iDose4-SDCT in both arterial phase (AP), p < 0.0001, and delayed phase (DP), p < 0.0001. Image noise was significantly lower in IMR-LDCT compared to iDose4-SDCT in AP, portal venous phase, and DP with p < 0.0001. IMR-LDCT showed significantly higher SNRPV (p < 0.0001) and SNRIVC (p < 0.0001) compared to iDose4-SDCT. On subjective analysis, IMR-LDCT images showed better image quality in AP, portal venous phase, and DP and better tumor conspicuity in AP and DP. IMR-LDCT (21.4 ± 4.6 mSv) achieved 36.9% reduction in the effective dose compared to iDose4-SDCT (33.9 ± 6.2 mSv).
Conclusion:
IMR algorithm provides better image quality and tumor conspicuity with considerable decrease in image noise compared to iDose4 reconstruction technique even on LDCT.
More Related Videos
07:47Non-Invasive PET/MR Imaging in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: August 31, 2022
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
01:27Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
01:10Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...