Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Quantifying Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity in a Tumor Spheroid Model: Application for Drug Discovery
Published on: April 26, 2024
Management of Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal
Hope S Rugo1, Jens Huober2, José A García-Sáenz3
1University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Background:
Abemaciclib demonstrated efficacy in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Here we provide a comprehensive summary of the most common adverse events (AEs), their management, and whether AEs or dose reductions influenced progression-free survival (PFS), in the MONARCH 2 and 3 trials.
Materials And Methods:
Incidence of the most clinically relevant AEs, management, and outcomes were summarized. Time-dependent covariate analyses examined the impact of dose reductions on PFS. PFS was estimated for patients with and without early onset of diarrhea or neutropenia.
Results:
The most frequently reported AE was diarrhea, with clinically significant diarrhea (grade ≥2) reported for 42.8% of patients taking abemaciclib. Median time to onset was 1 week, and duration ranged from 6 to 12 days, depending on grade and study. Diarrhea was adequately managed by antidiarrheal medication (72.8%), dose omissions (17.3%), and reductions (16.7%). The highest rates of grade ≥2 diarrhea were observed in the first cycles and decreased in subsequent cycles. Neutropenia (grade ≥3) occurred in 25.4% of abemaciclib-treated patients. Neutropenia resolved with dose omissions (16.8%) and/or dose reductions (11.2%). Incidence of febrile neutropenia (0.7%) or other relevant grade ≥3 hematological events (<9%) was low. Venous thromboembolic events (5.3%) were primarily treated with anticoagulants. Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (3.4%) was treated with corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. PFS benefit of abemaciclib was not impacted by dose reductions or early onset of toxicities.
Conclusion:
Abemaciclib was generally well tolerated. The most common AEs were effectively managed by supportive medications, and/or dose adjustments, with no detriment to PFS.
Implications For Practice:
Treatment with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant or nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors is generally well tolerated in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. In MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3, any-grade diarrhea and grade ≥3 neutropenia were effectively managed with supportive medication and/or dose adjustment. Venous thromboembolic events were treated with anticoagulants and did not often require treatment discontinuation. Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis was infrequent and treated with corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Clinicians should be aware of and implement management strategies, including dose adjustments according to local labels, for commonly occurring and serious adverse events to ensure continued treatment and optimize clinical benefit/risk ratio.
Insights
Abemaciclib is effective for advanced breast cancer and generally well-tolerated. Common adverse events like diarrhea and neutropenia were manageable with dose adjustments, without impacting progression-free survival (PFS).
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Abemaciclib shows efficacy in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
- Understanding adverse events (AEs) and their impact on treatment is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To summarize common AEs of abemaciclib, their management, and impact on progression-free survival (PFS).
- To analyze AE management strategies in the MONARCH 2 and 3 trials.
Main Methods:
- Summarized incidence and management of clinically relevant AEs.
- Conducted time-dependent covariate analyses to assess the impact of dose reductions on PFS.
- Estimated PFS for patients with and without early onset of specific toxicities.
Main Results:
- Diarrhea (any grade) occurred in 42.8% of patients, managed with medication or dose adjustments.
- Grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 25.4% of patients, resolved with dose modifications.
- Serious AEs like venous thromboembolic events and interstitial lung disease were infrequent and managed with standard treatments.
- AEs or dose reductions did not negatively impact PFS.
Conclusions:
- Abemaciclib is generally well-tolerated in advanced breast cancer.
- Common AEs are effectively managed with supportive care and dose adjustments, preserving PFS.
- Clinicians should implement management strategies for AEs to optimize the benefit/risk ratio.
More Related Videos
14:20Polymalic Acid-based Nano Biopolymers for Targeting of Multiple Tumor Markers: An Opportunity for Personalized Medicine?
Published on: June 13, 2014
08:59Looking for Driver Pathways of Acquired Resistance to Targeted Therapy: Drug Resistant Subclone Generation and Sensitivity Restoring by Gene Knock-down
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...