Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
Margin Reanalysis With 3-Dimensional Micrographic Surgery Technique of Conventional Excision Specimens With Negative
Julio Magliano1, Jorge Navarrete1,2, Verónica Lezue1
1Dermatology Department, Hospital de Clínicas Dr. Manuel Quintela, Montevideo, Uruguay; and.
Conventional skin cancer surgery processing may miss positive margins, leading to false negatives. Mohs micrographic surgery offers superior margin evaluation, proving itself the gold standard for skin tumor treatment.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Surgical Oncology
- Pathology
Background:
- Mohs micrographic surgery offers superior margin analysis for skin tumors, resulting in lower recurrence rates compared to conventional surgical methods.
- Routine processing of conventional excision specimens analyzes less than 0.5% of tumor margins.
- A direct comparison between conventional processing and Mohs micrographic technique for margin assessment has not been previously conducted.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the margin assessment accuracy of conventional nonmelanoma skin cancer excision with serial transverse sectioning ('bread-loafing') against Mohs micrographic technique.
- To identify discrepancies in margin readings between the two techniques for histopathologically confirmed negative margins via conventional methods.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, descriptive, historical cohort study design.
- Inclusion of patients with nonmelanoma skin cancers treated with conventional excision and negative margin readings between 2010 and 2013.
- Dewaxing and processing of original surgical specimens using the 3-dimensional Mohs micrographic technique for comparative analysis.
Main Results:
- Analysis of 101 basal cell carcinomas and 26 squamous cell carcinomas revealed 13 positive fragments (11 patients, 8.7%) initially reported as negative.
- Lateral margins were the most frequently affected sites in false-negative cases (81.8%).
- No significant association was found between false-negative margin results and specific histopathologic types or subtypes of skin cancer.
Conclusions:
- The 'bread-loafing' technique for processing conventional surgical excisions can lead to inaccurate reporting of tumor margin status.
- Mohs micrographic surgery demonstrates superior accuracy in margin evaluation for nonmelanoma skin cancers.
- Mohs micrographic surgery should be considered the gold standard for margin assessment in skin cancer treatment.
More Related Videos
07:47Author Spotlight: 3D Scanning and Augmented Reality for Enhanced Cancer Surgery Communication
Published on: December 15, 2023
10:33Molecular Profiling of the Invasive Tumor Microenvironment in a 3-Dimensional Model of Colorectal Cancer Cells and Ex vivo Fibroblasts
Published on: April 29, 2014