Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

4.4K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.4K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

10.0K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.0K
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment01:29

Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment

102
Product specifications define the acceptable quality of a pharmaceutical product by ensuring identity, purity, potency, and strength. These specifications serve as benchmarks during development, manufacturing, and post-approval quality control. Clinically relevant specifications are particularly important because they directly relate to a drug's safety and efficacy in clinical use.Dissolution studies are critical biopharmaceutic tools that link in vitro behavior to in vivo performance. They...
102
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

5.6K
Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
5.6K
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation01:10

In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation

157
In vitro dissolution and drug release tests assess how quickly and how much of a drug is released from its dosage form into an aqueous medium under standardized laboratory conditions. These tests are essential tools in pharmaceutical development and quality assurance, offering insight into the drug's performance before clinical use.During formulation development, dissolution testing identifies incomplete or inconsistent drug release issues. It also supports decisions on selecting the optimal...
157
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

294
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
294

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multi-omics profiling of chronic immune-mediated skin diseases: SKINERGY protocol and strategic evaluation.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2026
Same author

Added value of a wrist-worn device for assessing tremor in Parkinson's disease: reliability and validity of tremor evaluation at home.

NPJ Parkinson's disease·2025
Same author

Intravenous Salbutamol for Children With Severe Acute Asthma on a Dutch Pediatric Ward: An Effective and Child-Friendly Alternative.

Pediatric pulmonology·2025
Same author

Challenges and opportunities of pharmacological interventions for osteoarthritis: A review of current clinical trials and developments.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage open·2022
Same author

COVID-19 in children and adolescents: MIS(-C)-taken diagnoses.

European journal of pediatrics·2022
Same author

Using machine learning techniques to characterize sleep-deprived driving behavior.

Traffic injury prevention·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exercise Test for Evaluation of the Functional Efficacy of the Pig Cardiovascular System
02:47

Author Spotlight: Exercise Test for Evaluation of the Functional Efficacy of the Pig Cardiovascular System

Published on: May 12, 2023

1.8K

Development of Novel, Value-Based, Digital Endpoints for Clinical Trials: A Structured Approach Toward

M D Kruizinga1, F E Stuurman1, V Exadaktylos1

  • 1Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands (M.D.K., F.E.S., V.E., R.J.D., G.J.G., A.F.C.); Juliana Children's Hospital, HAGA Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands (M.D.K., G.J.A.D.); Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands (M.D.K., F.E.S., G.J.G., A.F.C.); and Critical Path for Parkinson's Consortium, Critical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona (D.T.S.).

Pharmacological Reviews
|September 22, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Novel digital endpoints offer promise for clinical trials but require clear validation. This paper presents a pragmatic framework for selecting and validating these digital measurements for reliable use.

More Related Videos

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
09:09

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

2.1K
A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
04:24

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

Published on: April 19, 2019

12.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exercise Test for Evaluation of the Functional Efficacy of the Pig Cardiovascular System
02:47

Author Spotlight: Exercise Test for Evaluation of the Functional Efficacy of the Pig Cardiovascular System

Published on: May 12, 2023

1.8K
In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
09:09

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease

Published on: May 27, 2022

2.1K
A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
04:24

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

Published on: April 19, 2019

12.1K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical trial methodology
  • Digital health technologies
  • Biomedical informatics

Background:

  • Novel digital endpoints from wearables and algorithms show potential for clinical trials.
  • Slow implementation is attributed to a lack of validation guidelines for these new measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a pragmatic approach for the selection and fit-for-purpose validation of digital endpoints.
  • To provide criteria for technical and clinical validation of digital measurements in clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • Value-based selection focusing on meaningful patient outcomes.
  • Assessment of technological validity for devices.
  • Rigorous clinical validation including tolerability, patient-control differences, repeatability, event detection, and correlation with traditional endpoints.

Main Results:

  • A framework for evaluating digital endpoints based on technological and clinical validity.
  • Demonstration of how validated digital endpoints can support evidence generation in interventional trials.
  • Potential for digital endpoints to replace traditional measures like scales and questionnaires.

Conclusions:

  • Adoption of this pragmatic approach will facilitate timely implementation of digital measurements in clinical trials and healthcare.
  • Recommendations include increased data-sharing collaborations and integration of value-based measurements into clinical care.
  • Encourages researchers and regulators to adopt these criteria for advancing digital health in trials and healthcare.