Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biases and weak associations.

M Feinleib

    Preventive Medicine
    |March 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Minimizing bias, or systematic error, in epidemiological studies is crucial for accurate results, especially when examining weak associations between exposures and disease. This study details common biases and strategies to avoid them throughout the research process.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Mortality surveillance system: the first models from year.

    Vital and health statistics. Series 20, Data from the National Vital Statistics System·2014
    Same author

    Mortality surveillance system: models from the second year.

    Vital and health statistics. Series 20, Data from the National Vital Statistics System·2014
    Same author

    Association between endogenous sex steroid hormones and inflammatory biomarkers in US men.

    Andrology·2013
    Same author

    Brian MacMahon (1923-2007): founder of modern epidemiology.

    Cancer causes & control : CCC·2008
    Same author

    Folate fortification for the prevention of birth defects: case study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2001
    Same author

    Mortality of men versus women in comparable high-level jobs: 15-year experience in the Federal Women's Study.

    American journal of epidemiology·2001
    Same journal

    Behavioral economic demand analysis: A multidimensional framework for understanding drug reinforcement and tobacco science.

    Preventive medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Corrigendum to 'Differential associations of objective hearing loss and subjective hearing difficulty with depressive symptom profiles: A nationwide population-based study in Korea' [Preventive Medicine 210 (2026) 108620].

    Preventive medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Adverse childhood experiences and household firearm ownership: A large-scale analysis of specific risk factors among 15,771 adults from four U.S. states.

    Preventive medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Worldwide prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Preventive medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Employment insecurity and binge drinking in the United States: Implications of unemployment insurance.

    Preventive medicine·2026
    Same journal

    The dual use dilemma: Is it better to have tried and failed to quit smoking with e-cigarettes or to have never tried e-cigarettes at all?

    Preventive medicine·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics
    • Public Health

    Background:

    • Bias represents systematic error in study design, conduct, analysis, or interpretation.
    • Such errors can lead to inaccurate assessments of associations between exposures and disease.
    • Minimizing bias is a primary goal in epidemiological research.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify and describe major sources of bias in epidemiological studies.
    • To provide strategies for avoiding bias at each stage of a study.
    • To emphasize the importance of bias control when evaluating weak associations.

    Main Methods:

    • Review and synthesis of common biases in epidemiological research.
    • Discussion of bias occurrence and avoidance strategies across study phases.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on biases relevant to weak association investigations.

    • Main Results:

    • Systematic errors (biases) can occur during study design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
    • Biases distort the true relationship between risk factors and health outcomes.
    • Specific biases are particularly impactful when investigating subtle or weak associations.

    Conclusions:

    • Rigorous attention to minimizing bias at all research stages is essential for valid epidemiological findings.
    • Effective bias control is critical for accurately understanding weak but potentially important associations.
    • Proactive bias avoidance strengthens the reliability of epidemiological evidence.