Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.4K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.4K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.3K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.3K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.3K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.3K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.3K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.3K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

2.7K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
2.7K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.3K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Large Magnetoresistance in a Si-Based Double-Tunnel Junction with Purely Organic Radical Molecules.

Nano letters·2026
Same author

Host-Guest Interactions Enhance Charge Transport across Single Cyclodextrin/Azobenzene Complex Junction.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Uncertainty Quantification for <i>In Silico</i> Chemistry.

Chemical reviews·2026
Same author

Predicting the Stability of Base-mediated C─H Carboxylation Adducts Using Data Science Tools.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2025
Same author

The Next 25 Years of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: A <i>Nano Letters</i> Roadmap.

Nano letters·2025
Same author

Revisiting Mayr's reactivity database: expansion, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty quantification.

Organic & biomolecular chemistry·2025
Same journal

Modeling the Clustering of Fumaric/Maleic Acid with Water and Na<sup>+</sup>, Cl<sup>-</sup> Ions.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same journal

Determining Binding Energies of Key Fluorinated Refrigerants 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane, 2,3,3,3-Tetrafluoropropene, and 3,3,3-Trifluoropropene.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same journal

Kinetic and Mechanistic Insights into H-Abstraction and Subsequent Isomerization and Decomposition of Monoglyme and Key Combustion Intermediates.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same journal

First-Principles Analysis of Protonation-Induced Electronic Effects in Tetrakis(<i>p</i>-aminophenyl)porphyrin (TAPP).

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Reactivity of the CH Radical toward Nitrous Oxide in the Context of the Interstellar Medium.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
Same journal

Infrared Photodissociation Spectroscopy of Benzene-V<sup>+</sup>(CO)<sub>n</sub> "Piano Stool" Cations.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Optical Tweezers to Study RNA-Protein Interactions in Translation Regulation
12:26

Optical Tweezers to Study RNA-Protein Interactions in Translation Regulation

Published on: February 12, 2022

5.5K

Exchange Spin Coupling from Gaussian Process Regression.

Marc Philipp Bahlke1, Natnael Mogos1, Jonny Proppe2

  • 1Department of Chemistry, University of Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A
|September 22, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning can predict Heisenberg exchange spin coupling, crucial for molecular magnets and catalysts. A simple descriptor based on chemical intuition outperformed complex ones for extrapolation, highlighting feature selection

More Related Videos

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.4K
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Optical Tweezers to Study RNA-Protein Interactions in Translation Regulation
12:26

Optical Tweezers to Study RNA-Protein Interactions in Translation Regulation

Published on: February 12, 2022

5.5K
Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

18.4K
Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry and materials science.
  • Quantum mechanics and electronic structure theory.

Background:

  • Heisenberg exchange spin coupling is vital for molecular catalysts, metalloenzymes, and magnets.
  • Understanding spin coupling is key for applications in information technology and catalysis.
  • Machine learning applications in chemistry often require extensive datasets, posing challenges for complex systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the machine-learnability of Heisenberg exchange spin coupling using Gaussian process regression.
  • To explore the effectiveness of various descriptors and kernels for predicting spin coupling.
  • To compare machine learning performance against traditional methods like linear regression.

Main Methods:

  • Employed Gaussian process regression (GPR) for its ability to handle small datasets and provide uncertainty estimates.
  • Utilized a dataset of 257 small dicopper complexes.
  • Compared a simple, chemically intuitive descriptor (Cu-X-Cu angles, Cu-Cu distances) against more sophisticated descriptors.

Main Results:

  • A simple descriptor based on chemical intuition significantly outperformed sophisticated descriptors in extrapolating to larger complexes.
  • Gaussian process regression demonstrated that exchange spin coupling is as machine-learnable as polarizability, but less so than dipole moments.
  • Linear ridge regression performed comparably to kernel-based GPR on the small dicopper dataset due to descriptor-induced linearization.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of descriptor is critical for accurate machine learning predictions of exchange spin coupling, especially for extrapolation.
  • Chemical intuition in feature selection can be highly effective, rivaling automated methods for specific chemical problems.
  • This study underscores the importance of balancing descriptor complexity with predictive power and extrapolation capability in machine learning for materials science.