Related Experiment Videos
Lumbar laminectomy for herniated disc: a prospective controlled comparison with internal fixation fusion
Spine
|April 1, 1987
Summary
For herniated lumbar discs, intertransverse fusion with internal fixation after laminectomy did not improve outcomes. The nonfusion group showed better excellent results and faster return to work.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Spine Surgery
Background:
- Herniated lumbar discs are a common cause of low back pain.
- Surgical intervention, including laminectomy and fusion, is a treatment option.
- The necessity and efficacy of fusion in conjunction with laminectomy for herniated discs remain debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of bilateral lumbar laminectomy with and without intertransverse fusion and internal fixation for herniated lumbar discs.
- To evaluate the long-term success rates based on functional and subjective criteria.
Main Methods:
- A controlled prospective study of matched patients with herniated lumbar discs.
- Two groups: one with laminectomy and disc excision only, the other with added intertransverse fusion and internal fixation.
- Outcomes assessed by an independent examiner at an average of 3 years postoperatively, including activity level, medication use, and subjective/objective evaluations.
Main Results:
- Both groups had an overall success rate of 87%.
- Patients undergoing fusion had a significantly longer mean time to return to work.
- Excellent results were achieved by 29% of the nonfusion group versus 11% of the fusion group.
Conclusions:
- Intertransverse fusion with internal fixation is not necessary for simple herniated lumbar disc cases treated with laminectomy.
- Fusion may lead to less favorable excellent outcomes and delayed return to work compared to nonfusion.
- Conservative care for at least 3 months is a prerequisite for surgical consideration.