Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)01:14

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

6.1K
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is the combination of analytical techniques of gas chromatography and mass spectrometry in a single instrument for analyzing a mixture of compounds. The gas chromatograph separates the compounds in the mixture, and the mass spectrometer analyzes each compound separately to determine the molecular masses and molecular structures.
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
6.1K
Gas Chromatography: Sample Injection Systems01:08

Gas Chromatography: Sample Injection Systems

1.1K
In gas chromatography, the sample is introduced as a vapor plug into the carrier gas stream for high efficiency and resolution. A microsyringe injects the sample solution into a heated sample port, vaporizing it and mixing it with the carrier gas. This process is important to ensure the sample is properly prepared for analysis. Thermally sensitive samples can be injected directly into the column and volatilized by slowly increasing the column temperature.
Two primary injection methods are used...
1.1K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

1.5K
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
1.5K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II01:19

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

924
In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...
924
Gas Chromatography: Introduction01:13

Gas Chromatography: Introduction

3.2K
Gas chromatography (GC) is a technique for separating and analyzing volatile compounds in a sample. Its primary purpose is to identify and quantify components in complex mixtures, making it essential in fields such as environmental analysis, pharmaceuticals, and petrochemicals. GC is also called vapor-phase chromatography (VPC) or gas-liquid partition chromatography (GLPC).
In GC,  a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...
3.2K
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I01:21

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

1.2K
There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A unified constitutive model for yielding single-lining tunnel supports with resistance limiters under large deformation.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Enhancing the Hemocompatibility of 3D-Printable Silicone Elastomers for Artificial Lung Applications.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2026
Same author

Predicting CO2 emissions and strength of FA-SF geopolymer mortar: An ANN approach for sustainable construction.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Antioxidant and Photocatalytic Activities of Olea europaea (Wild Olive) Derived Carbon Dots From District Barkhan, Pakistan.

Chemistry & biodiversity·2025
Same author

Isolation, Characterization, and Modes of Action of Antifungal Compounds from Rhizomes of Dryopteris nigropaleacea.

Current microbiology·2025
Same author

Self-sensing capabilities in steel fiber-reinforced concrete for shrinkage resistance and structural health monitoring.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Fast Enzymatic Processing of Proteins for MS Detection with a Flow-through Microreactor
09:49

Fast Enzymatic Processing of Proteins for MS Detection with a Flow-through Microreactor

Published on: April 6, 2016

8.3K

A micro passive preconcentrator for micro gas chromatography.

Changhua Zhan1, Muhammad Akbar, Robert Hower

  • 1Department of Environental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. ezellers@umich.edu.

The Analyst
|September 23, 2020
PubMed
Summary

A novel microfabricated passive preconcentrator (μPP) enhances gas chromatography analysis of volatile organic compounds. This device offers high capacity, efficient desorption, and stable sampling rates for diverse S/VOCs.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Characterization of Low-Affinity Protein Interactions in Solution Using MassFluidix Technology
06:39

Author Spotlight: Characterization of Low-Affinity Protein Interactions in Solution Using MassFluidix Technology

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.6K
A Microfluidic Chip for ICPMS Sample Introduction
11:16

A Microfluidic Chip for ICPMS Sample Introduction

Published on: March 5, 2015

11.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Fast Enzymatic Processing of Proteins for MS Detection with a Flow-through Microreactor
09:49

Fast Enzymatic Processing of Proteins for MS Detection with a Flow-through Microreactor

Published on: April 6, 2016

8.3K
Author Spotlight: Characterization of Low-Affinity Protein Interactions in Solution Using MassFluidix Technology
06:39

Author Spotlight: Characterization of Low-Affinity Protein Interactions in Solution Using MassFluidix Technology

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.6K
A Microfluidic Chip for ICPMS Sample Introduction
11:16

A Microfluidic Chip for ICPMS Sample Introduction

Published on: March 5, 2015

11.6K

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Microfabrication
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Gas chromatography (GC) is crucial for analyzing volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (S/VOCs).
  • Integrating preconcentrators into micro-GC systems (μGC) can improve sensitivity and portability.
  • Existing preconcentrators face challenges in capacity, efficiency, and long-term stability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and characterize a microfabricated passive preconcentrator (μPP) for S/VOC analysis.
  • To evaluate the μPP's sampling rates, capacity, and desorption efficiency.
  • To assess the μPP's performance for both individual compounds and mixtures over time and concentration ranges.

Main Methods:

  • Fabrication of μPP devices using silicon-on-insulator and glass layers with integrated apertures and adsorbent-packed cavities.
  • Testing with 15 diverse S/VOCs across a range of vapor pressures and concentrations.
  • Measurement of effective diffusional sampling rates, desorption efficiencies, and performance stability over extended exposure durations.

Main Results:

  • Effective sampling rates ranged from 0.16 to 0.78 mL min-1, with observed and modeled rates agreeing within 15%.
  • Desorption efficiencies exceeded 95% for most compounds at temperatures between 250-275 °C.
  • Sampling rates showed good stability, declining by ≤30% over 24 hours and exhibiting minimal change across a wide concentration range.

Conclusions:

  • The μPP is a promising passive sampling device for integration into μGC systems.
  • It demonstrates high capacity, efficient vapor transfer, and stable performance for diverse S/VOCs.
  • The device offers advantages including low energy consumption during sampling and a robust fabrication process.