Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.9K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.9K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

5.3K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
5.3K
tRNA Activation02:26

tRNA Activation

21.8K
Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are present in both eukaryotes and bacteria. Though eukaryotes have 20 different aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to couple to 20 amino acids, many bacteria do not have genes for all of these aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Despite this, they still use all 20 amino acids to synthesize their proteins. For instance, some bacteria do not have the gene encoding the enzyme that couples glutamine with its partner tRNA. In these organisms, one enzyme adds glutamic acid to all of the...
21.8K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

14.6K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
14.6K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

14.6K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
14.6K
Allosteric Proteins-ATCase01:19

Allosteric Proteins-ATCase

6.3K
Binding sites linkages can regulate a protein's function.  For example, enzyme activity is often regulated through a feedback mechanism where the end product of the biochemical process serves as an inhibitor.
Aspartate transcarbamoylase (ATCase) is a cytosolic enzyme that catalyzes the condensation of L-aspartate and carbamoyl phosphate to  N-carbamoyl-L-aspartate. This reaction is the first step in pyrimidine biosynthesis. UTP and CTP, the end products of the pyrimidine synthesis...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for Highly Ionizing Particles in pp Collisions during LHC Run 2 Using the Full MoEDAL Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Erratum: First Search for Dyons with the Full MoEDAL Trapping Detector in 13 TeV pp Collisions [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 071801 (2021)].

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

MoEDAL Search in the CMS Beam Pipe for Magnetic Monopoles Produced via the Schwinger Effect.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

An In Silico Investigation of the Molecular Interactions between Volatile Anesthetics and Actin.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Thermal hysteresis in microtubule assembly/disassembly dynamics: The aging-induced degradation of tubulin dimers.

Biochemistry and biophysics reports·2022
Same author

On the significance of the electrostatic differences between cancer and normal cells: Comment on: "Improving cancer treatments via dynamical biophysical models" by Kuznetsov et al.

Physics of life reviews·2021
Same journal

Spatiotemporal bursting in simulated cultures of cortical neurons.

Bio Systems·2026
Same journal

A brief discussion on recent models shedding light on how life emerged.

Bio Systems·2026
Same journal

Memory-based strategy reputation and adaptive learning in spatial evolutionary games: A robust agent-based model for cooperation dynamics.

Bio Systems·2026
Same journal

Coherent Photonic Biofields: Revisiting Fritz-Albert Popp's Hypothesis.

Bio Systems·2026
Same journal

Ruliological Resilience: Pattern Restoration and Robustness in Wolfram Patterns. A Basis for Regeneration, Not Just in Cone Shells?

Bio Systems·2026
Same journal

The quantum-to-classical transducer: A thermodynamic and quantum mechanical framework for the emergence of bioenergetics.

Bio Systems·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

731

Testing amino acid-codon affinity hypothesis using molecular docking.

S Arbabi Moghadam1, J Preto2, M Klobukowski3

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada.

Bio Systems
|September 23, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Investigating the genetic code, this study used molecular docking to test if amino acids bind to their corresponding codons. Results showed no direct binding preference, suggesting complex mechanisms govern genetic code specificity.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.3K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

731
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.3K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Biophysics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • The genetic code translates nucleotide triplets (codons) into amino acids during protein synthesis.
  • Understanding the thermodynamic basis of codon-amino acid assignments remains a challenge.
  • Existing knowledge focuses on the rules, not the underlying energetic or entropic principles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the thermodynamic rules governing DNA translation.
  • To determine if amino acids exhibit binding preferences for their cognate codons or anticodons.
  • To explore the role of direct binding in codon-amino acid specificity.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized molecular docking simulations to assess binding interactions.
  • Performed 1280 direct docking interactions for each amino acid-codon/anticodon pair.
  • Analyzed docking scores as a proxy for binding affinity.

Main Results:

  • No significant correlation was observed between docking scores and established genetic code correspondence rules.
  • Amino acids did not show a clear preference for binding to their cognate codons or anticodons.
  • Direct binding affinity does not appear to be the primary determinant of codon-amino acid specificity.

Conclusions:

  • The specificity of the genetic code is likely not explained by simple direct binding affinity.
  • More complex molecular or cellular mechanisms may underlie the precise assignment of amino acids to codons.
  • Further research is needed to uncover the subtle processes governing genetic code accuracy.