Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 8, 2025

05:49
Modeling the Effects of Hemodynamic Stress on Circulating Tumor Cells using a Syringe and Needle
Published on: April 27, 2021
2.8K
Machine Learning Model to Predict Pseudoprogression Versus Progression in Glioblastoma Using MRI: A
Bum-Sup Jang1, Andrew J Park2, Seung Hyuck Jeon3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea.
Cancers
|September 24, 2020
Summary
A new deep learning model accurately distinguishes between pseudoprogression and progressive disease in glioblastoma patients after chemoradiation. This tool aids clinicians in making better treatment decisions for brain tumor patients.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Medical Imaging Analysis
Background:
- Glioblastoma patients can exhibit imaging changes post-chemoradiation, mimicking disease progression.
- Differentiating pseudoprogression (PsPD) from true progressive disease (PD) is crucial for optimal glioblastoma management.
- Previous machine learning models showed promise but required validation on larger, multi-institutional datasets.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a robust deep learning model for predicting pseudoprogression versus progressive disease in glioblastoma.
- To improve diagnostic accuracy in challenging post-treatment imaging scenarios.
- To provide a clinically applicable tool for real-world patient care.
Main Methods:
- A multi-institutional dataset (Korean Radiation Oncology Group, KROG, N=104) was combined with a prior dataset (Seoul National University Hospital, SNUH, N=78) for a total of N=182.
- A deep learning model was developed and optimized using hyperparameter tuning on the combined dataset.
- Performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, focusing on the micro-average area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC).
- A calibration model was implemented to provide interpretable clinical probabilities.
Main Results:
- The initial model tested on the KROG dataset showed limited performance.
- The optimized deep learning model achieved a micro-average AUPRC of 0.86 on the combined dataset (N=182).
- The integrated calibration model provides direct, interpretable probability outputs.
Conclusions:
- A refined deep learning approach effectively differentiates pseudoprogression from progressive disease in glioblastoma.
- The developed model, enhanced with calibration, offers a reliable tool for clinical decision support.
- This technology has the potential to improve treatment strategies and patient outcomes in neuro-oncology.