Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...

Lateralization

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Affective evaluation of self-produced action-effect episodes.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026

Same author

Agents' awareness of visuo-motor incongruency determines changes in haptic sensitivity.

Experimental brain research·2026

Same author

Response activation in error processing: Assessing leakage into upcoming action episodes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same author

Playing With Matches: Preparatory Cognitive Processing Shapes Affective Evaluation.

Journal of cognition·2026

Same author

Action Selection by Temporally Close Transitions? Subtle Evidence from the Removal of Tactile Stimulation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same author

Correction: The representational nature of action-effect relations: A memory process dissociation approach.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

Localizing modality compatibility effects: Evidence from dual-task interference.

Robert Wirth¹, Iring Koch², Wilfried Kunde¹

¹Department of Psychology, Julius Maximilians University of Würzburg.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance

|September 24, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Modality compatibility effects, where compatible stimulus-response sets improve performance, arise before central processing limitations. This suggests effector demands bias early perceptual processing toward compatible stimuli.

More Related Videos

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive psychology
Human-computer interaction
Neuroscience

Background:

Performance is generally better with modality-compatible stimulus-response sets.
Modality-incompatible sets often lead to decreased performance.
The exact information-processing stage of these compatibility effects is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the information-processing stage where modality compatibility effects emerge.
To determine if compatibility effects precede or originate from central capacity limitations.
To explore the influence of effector demands on perceptual processing.

Main Methods:

Three experiments were conducted using a dual-task paradigm.
Participants responded to stimuli presented in different modalities.
Response times and accuracy were measured to assess performance.

Main Results:

Modality compatibility effects were observed.
These effects were found to arise, at least partly, before a capacity-limited central processing stage.
Results indicate that compatibility effects are not solely attributable to central bottleneck limitations.

Conclusions:

Modality compatibility effects emerge, in part, at an early stage of information processing.
Effector system demands appear to bias perceptual processing towards compatible stimulus modalities.
These findings challenge the notion that central capacity limitations are the sole origin of dual-task costs related to modality compatibility.