Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Somatosensation01:33

Somatosensation

42.5K
The somatosensory system relays sensory information from the skin, mucous membranes, limbs, and joints. Somatosensation is more familiarly known as the sense of touch. A typical somatosensory pathway includes three types of long neurons: primary, secondary, and tertiary. Primary neurons have cell bodies located near the spinal cord in groups of neurons called dorsal root ganglia. The sensory neurons of ganglia innervate designated areas of skin called dermatomes.
42.5K
Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex01:14

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex

6.2K
The cerebral cortex, the brain's outermost layer, is pivotal in processing complex cognitive tasks, emotions, and various sensory inputs and executing voluntary motor activities. This intricate structure is divided into three primary functional areas: the motor areas, sensory areas, and association areas.
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex....
6.2K
Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

5.6K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
5.6K
Muscle Coordination and Action01:24

Muscle Coordination and Action

2.8K
Muscle coordination is a complex and finely tuned process essential for smooth and purposeful movements like flexion, extension, adduction, abduction, and rotation. The human body orchestrates the actions of various muscles working in concert, each with a specific role. Four functional types describe how muscles work together: agonist, antagonist, synergist, and fixator.
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement....
2.8K
Direct Motor Pathways01:11

Direct Motor Pathways

3.8K
The direct motor pathways, also known as the pyramidal tracts, are a group of neural pathways that originate in the brain and descend through the spinal cord. They control the voluntary movement of the body. There are two major direct motor pathways: the corticospinal and the corticobulbar tracts.
The corticospinal tract is responsible for the voluntary movement of the limbs and trunk. It originates in the cerebral cortex of the brain and descends through the cerebrum's internal capsule and...
3.8K
Anatomical Movements00:51

Anatomical Movements

14.3K
Anatomical movements refer to the various actions or motions that can be performed by the body's joints and muscles. These movements are described using specific terms to provide a standardized way of discussing and understanding the range of motion at different joints.
Here are some common anatomical movements:
Flexion and extension motions are in the sagittal (anterior–posterior) plane of motion. These movements take place at the shoulder, hip, elbow, knee, wrist,...
14.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contributions of action representations to tool naming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

On the nature of action-sentence compatibility effects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024
Same author

Investigating the relationship between the Bayes factor and the separation of credible intervals.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021
Same author

The role of cognitive control and top-down processes in object affordances.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2021
Same author

Switching between lift and use grasp actions.

Cognition·2018
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.2K

Motor representations evoked by objects under varying action intentions.

Daniel N Bub1, Michael E J Masson1, Maria van Noordenne1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Victoria.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|September 24, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Object affordance research shows motor representations are not always automatically evoked by object images. Limb-specific effects depend on action planning processes, not just spatial codes.

More Related Videos

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
07:08

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings

Published on: August 1, 2018

8.6K
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

26.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 8, 2025

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.2K
Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings
07:08

Investigating Object Representations in the Macaque Dorsal Visual Stream Using Single-unit Recordings

Published on: August 1, 2018

8.6K
Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

26.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Control
  • Perception-Action

Background:

  • The concept of object affordance suggests motor representations are automatically triggered by graspable object images.
  • Previous studies interpreted behavioral effects as evidence for automatic motor activation based on object features.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the automaticity of motor representations evoked by object images.
  • To investigate the role of spatial codes versus limb-specific features in response selection.
  • To determine conditions under which limb-specific effects are automatically generated.

Main Methods:

  • Critically analyzed previous findings, reinterpreting them as based on spatial codes.
  • Conducted six experiments using keypress and reach-and-grasp tasks.
  • Presented images of graspable objects with superimposed pictured hands to assess response selection.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that previously observed effects were primarily based on spatial codes.
  • Showed that limb-specific effects on response selection can be automatically generated under specific task conditions.
  • Identified that control processes for hand selection and configuration influence whether motor or spatial features are triggered.

Conclusions:

  • Challenges the notion that object images automatically evoke motor representations.
  • Suggests that action planning processes mediate the influence of object features on motor responses.
  • Highlights the complexity of the object affordance concept, emphasizing the role of task-specific control processes.