Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Representing risks: supporting genetic counseling.

P Humphreys, D Berkeley

    Birth Defects Original Article Series
    |January 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Evolution of an audit and monitoring tool into an infection prevention and control process.

    The Journal of hospital infection·2016
    Same author

    Activity and MeCP2-dependent regulation of nNOS levels in enteric neurons.

    Neurogastroenterology and motility·2016
    Same author

    MeCP2 in the enteric nervous system.

    Neurogastroenterology and motility·2015
    Same author

    In vitro fungicidal activity of biocides against pharmaceutical environmental fungal isolates.

    Journal of applied microbiology·2015
    Same author

    Development of a growth medium suitable for exopolysaccharide production and structural characterisation by Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis AD011.

    Journal of microbiological methods·2014
    Same author

    Imaging, quantification and visualization of spatio-temporal patterning in mESC colonies under different culture conditions.

    Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2012
    Same journal

    A case of short-rib syndrome without polydactyly in a stillborn: a new type?

    Birth defects original article series·1996
    Same journal

    Hand malformations in the aborted embryo: an important source of genetic information.

    Birth defects original article series·1996
    Same journal

    Colophon: on doing morphology.

    Birth defects original article series·1996
    Same journal

    Congenital eye malformations: a descriptive epidemiologic study in about one million newborns in Italy.

    Birth defects original article series·1996
    Same journal

    CHARGE association in a neonate exposed in utero to carbon monoxide.

    Birth defects original article series·1996
    Same journal

    Fetal valproate embryopathy in twins: genetic modification of the response to a teratogen.

    Birth defects original article series·1996
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Prospective parents face complex decisions when considering genetic risks for their children. Understanding how parents conceptualize these risks is key to supporting their choices and minimizing future regret.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Reproductive Genetics
    • Decision Science

    Background:

    • Decisions about childbearing involve potential genetic risks.
    • Prospective parents' conceptualization of risk significantly influences their choices.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore how prospective parents conceptualize genetic risk.
    • To provide a framework for assisting parents in making informed decisions about childbearing with genetic risks.
    • To minimize parental regret regardless of the outcome.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of conceptualization levels of genetic risk.
    • Description of five distinct levels of risk abstraction.
    • Outline of implications for each conceptualization level.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Genetic risk conceptualization varies significantly among individuals.
    • Different levels of abstraction impact decision-making processes.
    • Understanding these levels is crucial for effective counseling.

    Conclusions:

    • Assisting parents requires exploring their unique risk conceptualizations.
    • A structured approach can help parents make decisions they are less likely to regret.
    • This framework supports ethical and informed reproductive choices.