Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Implantation Strategy for Non-Left Bundle Branch Block Patients: The ENHANCE CRT Study
Jagmeet P Singh1, Ronald D Berger2, Rahul N Doshi3
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology
|September 25, 2020
Summary
This study found no difference in cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes between QLV-based and anatomical LV lead implantation in non-left bundle branch block patients. Both approaches showed similar effectiveness, suggesting current methods are adequate.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Limited data exist on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) effectiveness in non-left bundle branch block (NLBBB) patients.
- Conventional CRT implantation relies on an anatomical approach.
- Targeting the latest activated region (QLV) may offer an individualized strategy for NLBBB patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes between a QLV-based LV lead implantation approach and a conventional anatomical implantation approach in NLBBB patients.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of CRT in NLBBB patients using a novel lead placement strategy.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 248 subjects with NLBBB at 29 U.S. centers.
- Subjects were randomized 2:1 to either QLV-based or anatomical LV lead implantation using a St. Jude Medical quadripolar CRT-D system.
- The primary endpoint was the clinical composite score at 12 months post-implantation.
Main Results:
- 191 subjects (128 QLV arm, 63 control arm) were analyzed at 12 months.
- The responder rate at 12 months was 67.2% in the QLV arm and 73.0% in the control arm (p=0.506).
- No significant differences in baseline characteristics or heart failure events were observed between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Patient-tailored LV lead placement guided by QLV did not demonstrate improved outcomes compared to the conventional anatomical approach in NLBBB patients.
- The study observed no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the two implantation strategies.
- Further research may be needed to explore the potential benefits of QLV-guided implantation in specific patient subgroups.
Keywords:
QLVcardiac resynchronization therapyleft bundle branch blocklongest electrical delaynon-left bundle branch blockright bundle branch block

