Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Probability Histograms01:17

Probability Histograms

12.9K
A probability histogram is a visual representation of a probability distribution. Similar a typical histogram, the probability histogram consists of contiguous (adjoining) boxes. It has both a horizontal axis and a vertical axis. The horizontal axis is labeled with what the data represents. The vertical axis is labeled with probability. Each rectangular bar in the histogram is 1 unit wide, which suggests that the area under each bar equals the probability, P(x), where x is 1, 2, 3, and so on.
12.9K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

16.6K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.6K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.6K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.9K
Multiple Bar Graph01:07

Multiple Bar Graph

8.7K
As the name suggests, a multiple bar graph is the same as a bar graph but has multiple bars to depict relationships between different data values. One can include as many parameters as possible. However, each parameter must have the same unit of measurement.
Each bar or column in the multiple bar graph represents a data value. These graphs are used primarily in interrelating two or more sets of data. The categories of different kinds of data are listed along the horizontal or x-axis, whereas...
8.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Analyzing and supporting mental representations and strategies in solving Bayesian problems.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Development of a p62 biodegrader for autophagy targeted degradation.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

The safety and use of perioperative dexamethasone in the perioperative management of primary sporadic supratentorial meningiomas.

Frontiers in oncology·2024
Same author

Fostering diagnostic competence in prospective mathematics elementary teachers through epistemic activities.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same author

Measuring people's covariational reasoning in Bayesian situations.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Analyzing and supporting mental representations and strategies in solving Bayesian problems.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same journal

A fair lexical decision task for monolingual and multilingual Spanish-speakers.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Post-disaster psychological effects: identifying earthquake-induced trauma in athletes.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

On the contemporary history of learning disability identification procedures-a systematic literature review (1960-2000).

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Adolescent Mental Toughness Questionnaire (aMTQ10): development, validation and norms.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Understanding secondary school students' intentions to learn artificial intelligence: a multigroup structural equation modeling analysis.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Rethinking directiveness in AI coaching chatbots.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
07:09

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

6.4K

Different Visualizations Cause Different Strategies When Dealing With Bayesian Situations.

Andreas Eichler1, Katharina Böcherer-Linder2, Markus Vogel3

  • 1Institute of Mathematics, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.

Frontiers in Psychology
|September 25, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visualizations significantly impact Bayesian reasoning. Tree diagrams, which clearly show set-subset relationships, improve performance compared to unit squares, reducing errors in Bayesian problem-solving.

Keywords:
Bayesian reasoningBayesian situationsnatural frequenciesstrategiesvisualization

More Related Videos

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.5K
Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
07:09

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

6.4K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.5K
Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Bayesian reasoning performance is influenced by statistical information representation.
  • Natural frequencies and visualizations enhance Bayesian reasoning compared to probabilities.
  • Understanding erroneous strategies is key to improving Bayesian problem-solving.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Analyze erroneous Bayesian reasoning strategies when information uses natural frequencies and visualizations.
  • Compare the impact of different visualizations (tree diagram vs. unit square, double-tree diagram vs. 2x2 table) on these strategies.
  • Investigate how visualization characteristics affect Bayesian reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted an experiment with 540 university students.
  • Randomly assigned students to four visualization conditions (tree diagram, unit square, double-tree diagram, 2x2 table).
  • Assessed student responses to four Bayesian reasoning problems, documenting numerator and denominator choices.

Main Results:

  • Erroneous strategies in Bayesian reasoning are highly visualization-dependent.
  • Visualizations that make the nested-set structure transparent facilitate Bayesian reasoning.
  • Tree diagrams, unlike unit squares, hinder correct denominator identification and promote incorrect numerator selection.

Conclusions:

  • Visualization design critically influences the accuracy of Bayesian reasoning.
  • Explicitly representing set-subset relationships in visualizations is crucial for effective Bayesian problem-solving.
  • Findings offer insights for developing better teaching methods for Bayesian reasoning.