Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
Shared decision making, aggression, and coercion in inpatients with schizophrenia
Johannes Hamann1, Miriam John1, Fabian Holzhüter1
1Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Shared decision making (SDM) benefits patients with involuntary admission or aggression similarly to others. However, SDM did not reduce aggression or coercive measures in psychiatric inpatients.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Investigating the impact of shared decision making (SDM) on psychiatric patients, particularly those with involuntary admission or aggression.
- Examining the relationship between coercive measures, patient aggression, and perceived involvement in treatment decisions.
- Addressing the need for effective interventions in acute psychiatric settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if shared decision making (SDM) has comparable effects for patients with involuntary admission or aggression versus those without.
- To assess whether SDM interventions can reduce patient aggression and the use of coercive measures.
- To investigate the impact of coercion on patients' perceived involvement in their treatment decisions.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the cluster-randomized SDM-PLUS trial involving 305 inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
- Compared an SDM intervention group with a treatment-as-usual control group across 12 acute psychiatric wards.
- Retrospectively collected data on patient aggression and coercive measures from patient records.
Main Results:
- Patients with involuntary admission or aggression experienced similar benefits from SDM regarding perceived involvement, adherence, and satisfaction.
- Aggression and coercive measures were infrequent during the study phase and primarily occurred early in the inpatient stay.
- The SDM intervention did not significantly reduce patient aggression or the use of coercive measures; prior coercion did not predict perceived involvement.
Conclusions:
- Shared decision making (SDM) appears equally beneficial for diverse patient groups in acute psychiatric care.
- Current SDM interventions may not directly decrease aggression or coercive measures during short inpatient stays.
- Future research should explore early-phase SDM interventions and long-term effects of participatory approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Obedience
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Psychosis and Antipsychotic Drugs: Overview
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications

