Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

253
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
253
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

436
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
436
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

172
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
172
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

293
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
293
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.1K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

13.0K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
13.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spirituality and Harmful or Hazardous Alcohol and Other Drug Use: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies.

JAMA psychiatry·2026
Same author

Meta-analysis with Jeffreys priors: Empirical frequentist properties.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

A meta-analytic review of cultural variation in affect valuation.

Psychological bulletin·2026
Same author

Resurrecting complete-case analysis: a defense.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Using directed acyclic graphs to determine whether multiple imputation or subsample-multiple imputation estimates of an exposure-outcome association are unbiased.

American journal of epidemiology·2025
Same author

Documentary films can increase public interest in plant-based diets in the USA.

Nature food·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

979

Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in Meta-Analyses.

Maya B Mathur1,2, Tyler J VanderWeele1,3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

Journal of the American Statistical Association
|September 28, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sensitivity analyses can assess unmeasured confounding in meta-analyses of observational studies. New methods quantify how confounding affects scientifically meaningful effect sizes, aiding causal evidence assessment.

Keywords:
BiasConfoundingMeta-analysisObservational studiesSensitivity analysis

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

979
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.9K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology and Biostatistics
  • Observational Study Analysis
  • Meta-Analysis Methodology

Background:

  • Random-effects meta-analyses of observational studies risk biased estimates due to unmeasured confounding.
  • Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding is crucial for reliable causal inference from meta-analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose novel sensitivity analysis methods for quantifying unmeasured confounding in random-effects meta-analyses.
  • To develop tools for estimating the confounding strength required to invalidate study findings.

Main Methods:

  • Developed sensitivity analyses to quantify the impact of specified unmeasured confounding on scientifically meaningful effect sizes.
  • Created converse methods to estimate the confounding strength needed to reduce meaningful effects below a threshold.
  • Utilized sharp bounds on single-study confounding bias, making no assumptions on confounder characteristics or functional forms.

Main Results:

  • Proposed methods quantify the reduction in scientifically meaningful effect sizes due to unmeasured confounding.
  • Developed estimators applicable when bias factors are normally distributed or assessed across fixed values.
  • Introduced the R package 'EValue' and a website for conducting these sensitivity analyses, including plots.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed sensitivity analyses enable principled assessment of causal evidence strength in meta-analyses.
  • These methods facilitate more robust interpretation of observational study syntheses by addressing unmeasured confounding.
  • The 'EValue' package and website provide practical tools for researchers to implement these advanced analyses.