Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
12.0K
Correlates of the Militant Extremist Mindset
Adrian Furnham1, George Horne2, Simmy Grover3
1BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway.
Frontiers in Psychology
|September 28, 2020
Summary
This study explored factors linked to the Militant Extremist Mindset (MEM) in young adults. Personality disorders and religiousness were key predictors across different MEM dimensions.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Belief Systems
Background:
- Understanding the psychological underpinnings of extremist beliefs is crucial for developing effective counter-strategies.
- The Militant Extremist Mindset (MEM) is a complex phenomenon influenced by personality, beliefs, and self-perception.
- Previous research has not comprehensively examined the interplay of personality traits, personal beliefs, and self-evaluation in relation to MEM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlates of bright- and dark-side personality, religious and political beliefs, and self-evaluation with beliefs in the Militant Extremist Mindset (MEM).
- To identify specific predictors for the three dimensions of MEM: Proviolence, Vile World, and Divine Power.
- To determine the proportion of variance in MEM dimensions explained by demographic, personality, and belief factors.
Main Methods:
- A sample of 506 young adults completed self-report measures.
- Measures included questionnaires for the Big Five traits, Self-Monitoring, Self-Evaluation, Personality Disorders, and a three-dimensional MEM questionnaire.
- Demographic data on religiousness and political liberalism were also collected.
Main Results:
- The three MEM dimensions (Proviolence, Vile World, Divine Power) showed varying correlates, with no single consistent trend.
- Personality disorder scores were positive predictors for all three MEM dimensions.
- The Vile World mindset was predicted by religiousness, liberalism, personality disorder scores, and negative self-monitoring.
- Religiousness significantly contributed to all subscales, particularly predicting the Divine Power mindset.
- Proviolence was predicted by most personality measures and sex.
- Demographic, personality, and belief factors accounted for 14% (Vile World) to 54% (Divine Power) of the variance in MEM.
Conclusions:
- Beliefs in the Militant Extremist Mindset are associated with a combination of personality traits (especially personality disorders), personal beliefs (religiousness and political views), and self-perception.
- Religiousness and personality disorders emerge as significant, cross-cutting predictors of different facets of the MEM.
- The findings highlight the multifaceted nature of extremist mindset formation, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions addressing both personality and belief systems.
Related Concept Videos
Group Polarization
38.2K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
38.2K
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
567
Affiliation motivation is the intrinsic desire to connect with others and belong to a social group, which plays a crucial role in forming and maintaining personal relationships. This type of motivation is essential for psychological well-being, as it provides individuals with a sense of community and support. An example of this is a student who joins a study group in order to feel a sense of connection. People with high affiliation motivation actively seek social approval, take satisfaction in...
567
Cognitive Dissonance
36.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
36.6K
Motivational Bias
243
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
243
Aggression
29.9K
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
29.9K
Need for Self-Esteem
136
The human need for self-esteem has long intrigued psychologists, leading to the development of several theories that explore its evolutionary and functional significance. Among the most influential are the sociometer, hierometer, and terror management theories. Each offers a unique perspective on why people strive for self-worth and how it shapes behavior and social interaction.Sociometer TheoryAccording to sociometer theory, self-esteem functions as an internal gauge of social acceptance. It...
136

