Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Standards for validating health measures: definition and content.

Journal of Chronic Diseases

|January 1, 1987

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A 12-item short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2019

Same author

Item selection for 12-item short forms of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12).

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2018

Same author

A 12-item short form of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2018

Same author

Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2007

Same author

The responsiveness of headache impact scales scored using 'classical' and 'modern' psychometric methods: a re-analysis of three clinical trials.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2003

Same author

A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2003

Establishing clear standards for health measures is crucial for accurate health assessment. This study defines key health concepts and proposes criteria for judging measure validity and consistent labeling.

Area of Science:

Health Assessment
Psychometrics
Measurement Science

Background:

The field of health assessment requires standardized methods for evaluating health measures.
Current health measures lack consistent standards for content validity and labeling.
A clear framework is needed to ensure the reliability and interpretability of health assessment tools.

Purpose of the Study:

To establish minimum standards for judging the content validity of health measures.
To define generic health concepts and their measurable dimensions.
To provide guidelines for consistent and accurate labeling of health measures.

Main Methods:

Analysis of the dimensionality of health and the range of measurable health states.
Definition of five generic health concepts: physical health, mental health, social functioning, role functioning, and general health perceptions.

Related Experiment Videos

Examination of items from widely used health measures to illustrate conceptual distinctions.

Main Results:

Derivation of minimum content validity standards based on health dimensionality and state range.
Clarification of distinctions among five core health concepts and their encompassed health states.
Demonstration of how items from existing measures align with defined health concepts.

Conclusions:

Adherence to defined standards will enhance the orderly progression of health assessment.
Consistent labeling of health measures, aligned with content and validity evidence, is recommended.
The proposed framework supports more rigorous and interpretable health assessment.