Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

A Multi-hole Cryovial Eliminates Freezing Artifacts when Muscle Tissues are Directly Immersed in Liquid Nitrogen
Published on: April 6, 2017
Analysis of the Effects of Cryofrequency on Localized Fat
Patrícia Froes Meyer1,2,3, Rodrigo Marcel Valentim Da Silva1,2,3, Eneida De Morais Carreiro1,2,3
1Drs. Meyer, da Silva, and Vasconcellos and Ms. Maia are with the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) in Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Ms. Da Costa, Freire, and Farias and Mr. Costa e Silva are with Potiguar University (UNP) in Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Cryofrequency combines cryotherapy with radiofrequency, reaching the tissue in different layers, providing various biological effects, and reducing localized adiposity. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the efficacy of cryofrequency in reducing localized adiposity. METHODS: The study population consisted of 63 women with infra-abdominal adiposity, evaluated before and after treatment using evaluation protocols, questionnaires, and ultrasound imaging. The volunteers were randomly distributed into three subgroups; of these, Group 1 (G01) received the cryofrequency treatment (temperature of -10°C, 85% power); Group 2 (G02) underwent cryofrequency associated with ultracavitation (frequency of 60 Hz, 70% power, shooting at 25%, duty cycle of 60% on and 40% off); and the control group (CG) received cryotherapy alone (temperature of -10°C). All groups were submitted to four treatment sessions, one session per week. RESULTS: The reduction in the fat layer analyzed by ultrasonography showed that the right side of G01 presented a significant difference in comparison with CG (p=0.01); a significant difference was also observed in the comparison between the G01 and G02 groups (p=0.001). Considering the left side, significant differences were observed in G01 when compared with CG (p=0.01) and between G01 and G02 (p=0.001). The variables of plicometry and perimetry presented a significant difference relative to in CG; however, no differences were observed with regard to weight or body mass index (p>0.05). The majority of participants reported positive feelings about the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The cryofrequency protocol alone led to a significant reduction in the fat layer but its association with ultracavitation led to superior results.

