Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure
Published on: June 5, 2020
Evaluation of the Inherent Toxicity Concept in Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment
L S McCarty1, C J Borgert2, L D Burgoon3
1L.S. McCarty Scientific Research & Consulting, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract:
Intrinsic/inherent chemical properties are characteristic, irrespective of the number of molecules present. However, toxicity is an extensive/extrinsic biochemical property that depends on the number of molecules. Paracelsus, often considered the father of toxicology, noted that all things are poisonous. Because dose magnitude (i.e., number of molecules) determines the occurrence of poisonous effects, toxicity cannot be an intrinsic/inherent biochemical property. Thus, toxicology's task is to determine case-specific risks resulting in adverse effects produced by the interaction of toxic doses/exposures, toxic mechanisms, and case-specific influencing factors. Experimental testing results are known to vary within and between chemicals, test organisms, and experimental conditions and repetitions; however, hazard-based approaches treat toxicity as a fixed and constant property. A logical alternative is the standard-risk, case-specific risk model. In this approach, testing data are defined as standard risks where the nature, magnitude, and toxicity effect is standardized to the organism, chemical, and test conditions. Interpolation/extrapolation of standard risks to site-specific conditions (i.e., case-specific risks) is challenging, requiring understanding of the influences of the complex interactions within and between differing species, conditions, and toxicity-modifying factors. Therefore, Paracelsus's paradigm is perhaps better abbreviated as "dose-causality-response", because a key interpretive requirement is establishing toxicity causality by separating mode/mechanism of toxic action from modifying factor influences in overall toxicity responses. Unfortunately, the current knowledge base is inadequate. Moving to a standard-risk-specific-risk paradigm would highlight the importance of improving the toxicity causality knowledge base. Thereby, a rationale would be provided for enhancing the design and interpretation of toxicity testing that is necessary for achieving advances in routine translation of standard-risk to specific-risk estimates-the raison d'être of regulatory risk decision making. Environ Toxicol Chem 2020;39:2351-2360. © 2020 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
The Periodic Table and Organismal Elements
Periodic Table Provides Information...
Effects of Chemicals: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

