Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

10:27
The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
Published on: April 19, 2019
7.3K
Test-retest reliability of prepulse inhibition paradigm using auditory evoked potentials
Nobuyuki Takeuchi1, Tomoaki Kinukawa2, Shunsuke Sugiyama3
1Neuropsychiatric Department, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan; Department of Psychiatry, Okazaki City Hospital, Okazaki 444-8553, Japan.
Neuroscience Research
|September 28, 2020
Summary
Prepulse inhibition (PPI) measured with auditory cortical responses shows good test-retest reliability for N100 and P200 components. This supports PPI as a reliable clinical tool for assessing inhibitory functions.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychology
- Auditory Neuroscience
Background:
- Prepulse inhibition (PPI) is a neurophysiological measure of sensorimotor gating.
- Traditionally assessed via acoustic startle reflexes, PPI is increasingly studied using event-related cortical potentials.
- Understanding the reliability of cortical PPI is crucial for its clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the test-retest reliability and validity of prepulse inhibition (PPI) measured using auditory change-related cortical responses.
- To evaluate the reliability of P50, N100, and P200 components in response to auditory stimuli.
- To determine the suitability of this method for clinical measurements of inhibitory functions.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-five healthy adults participated in two measurement sessions separated by at least 7 days.
- Four auditory stimuli were presented: Standard, Test alone, Prepulse alone, and Test + Prepulse.
- Intra-class correlation (ICC) was used to evaluate the reliability of latency, amplitude, and suppression rate for P50, N100, and P200 components.
Main Results:
- High ICC values for latency and amplitude were observed for most components, with lower values for Prepulse alone responses.
- ICC for the suppression rate of peak-to-peak amplitude exceeded 0.5.
- Good reproducibility was demonstrated for the N100 and P200 components.
Conclusions:
- The auditory cortical response-based prepulse inhibition (PPI) paradigm exhibits good test-retest reliability, particularly for N100 and P200 components.
- This method is a reliable tool for clinical assessment of inhibitory functions.
- Further research can explore PPI's application in various neurological and psychiatric conditions.

