Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization as a Tool for HPV-Related Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis
Published on: June 14, 2019
Human papillomavirus genotype-specific risks for cervical intraepithelial lesions
Mari Nygård1, Bo T Hansen1, Susanne K Kjaer2,3
1Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotype prevalence is shifting post-vaccination. HPV testing for cervical cancer screening may improve by focusing on nonavalent vaccine types, balancing harms and benefits.
Area of Science:
- Gynecology
- Oncology
- Virology
Background:
- Prevalence of different human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes is evolving following HPV vaccination initiatives.
- Understanding HPV type-specific risks is crucial for optimizing cervical cancer screening strategies.
- Cervical cancer screening relies on accurate detection and risk assessment associated with HPV genotypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate HPV type-specific prevalence, odds ratios (OR), and positive predictive values (PPV) for cervical cytological abnormalities.
- To analyze the performance of HPV genotypes in relation to high-grade cytology before the widespread HPV vaccination era.
- To inform future cervical cancer screening protocols in the context of changing HPV genotype landscapes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 41 different HPV genotypes in cervical samples from 8351 women aged 18-51 years.
- Data collected from a population-based sample prior to the HPV vaccination era (Study V501-033; NCT01077856).
- Statistical estimation of prevalence, OR, and PPV for various HPV genotype groups and cytological abnormalities.
Main Results:
- HPV16 prevalence was 4.9% with an OR of 11.9 for high-grade cytology.
- Nonavalent vaccine HPV types (16,18,31,33,45,52,58) showed a combined prevalence of 14.4% and an OR of 23.7.
- HPV types in screening but not vaccinated against (35,39,51,56,59,66,68) had a prevalence of 8.5% and an OR of 2.9; non-carcinogenic types had a prevalence of 11.8% and an OR of 1.5.
Conclusions:
- HPV screening tests may be more effective post-vaccination if focused on nonavalent vaccine HPV types.
- Screening for all 14 high-risk HPV types may lead to an imbalanced ratio of harms to benefits.
- Type-specific HPV prevalence and risk data are essential for refining cervical cancer screening guidelines.
More Related Videos
13:41Use of Interferon-γ Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay to Characterize Novel T-cell Epitopes of Human Papillomavirus
Published on: March 8, 2012
10:26RNAscope for In situ Detection of Transcriptionally Active Human Papillomavirus in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: March 11, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Rous Sarcoma Virus (RSV) and Cancer
RSV is a retrovirus that contains two copies of a plus-strand RNA genome. Its genome consists of four main open...
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Mechanisms of Retrovirus-induced Cancers
Non-LTR Retrotransposons
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...