Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Hemocompatibility Testing of Blood-Contacting Implants in a Flow Loop Model Mimicking Human Blood Flow
Published on: March 5, 2020
Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Blood Administration Process in Surgical Care Units: New Categories of
Nagah Abd El-Fattah Mohamed Aly1, Safaa M El-Shanawany, Tamer A Maher Ghoneim
1Nursing Administration, Faculty of Nursing, Matrouh University, Matrouh, Egypt (Dr Aly); Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt (Dr El-Shanawany); and Anesthesia & Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt (Dr Ghoneim).
Background:
Blood administration failures and errors have been a crucial issue in health care settings. Failure mode and effects analysis is an effective tool for the analysis of failures and errors in such lifesaving procedures. These failures or errors would lead to adverse outcomes for patients during blood administration.
Objectives:
The study aimed to: use health care failure mode and effect analysis (HFMEA) for assessing potential failure modes associated with blood administration processes among nurses; develop a categorization of blood administration errors; and identify underlying reasons, proactive measures for identified failure modes, and corrective actions for identified high-risk failures.
Methods:
A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in surgical care units by using observation, HFMEA, and brainstorming techniques. Prioritization of detected potential failures was performed by Pareto analysis.
Results:
Eleven practical steps and 38 potential failure modes associated with 11 categories of errors were detected in this process. These categories of errors were newly developed in this study. In total, 17 of 38 potential failures were detected as high-risk failures that occurred during the sample-drawing, checking, preparing, administering, and monitoring steps. For cause analysis of failures and errors, proactive suggested actions were undertaken for 38 potential failure modes, and corrective actions for 17 high-risk failures.
Conclusion:
HFMEA is an efficient and well-organized tool for identification of and reduction in high-risk failures and errors in the blood administration process among nurses without building punitive culture. This tool also helps pay attention to redesigning and standardizing the blood administration process as well as providing training and educational programs for providing knowledge.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Blood Transfusion
Blood Transfusion Overview
A blood transfusion is a medical procedure used to replace blood lost due to injury, surgery, or to treat conditions such as anemia or cancer. During a transfusion, donor blood is...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...

