Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative
Published on: August 21, 2021
Selection for feed efficiency using the social effects animal model in growing Duroc pigs: evaluation by simulation
William Herrera-Cáceres1, Juan Pablo Sánchez2
1Genetica i Millora Animal, Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentàries (IRTA), Torre Marimon s/n, Caldes de Montbui, Barcelona, 08140, Spain. william.herrera@irta.es.
The social effects animal model (SAM) for pig breeding did not improve feed conversion ratio (FCR) as expected. While social genetic effects are important, the model
Area of Science:
- Animal breeding and genetics
- Quantitative genetics
- Livestock production
Background:
- Traits in group-housed animals can be analyzed using the social effects animal model (SAM), offering more complete genetic correlation structures than the traditional animal model (AM).
- Previous studies reported unfavorable genetic correlations between average daily gain (ADG) and backfat thickness (BF) in Duroc pigs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the SAM in genetic evaluations for ADG and BF to indirectly improve feed conversion ratio (FCR).
- To assess if the SAM could mitigate unfavorable genetic correlations between ADG and BF.
Main Methods:
- Estimated genetic and non-genetic correlations between BF, ADG, and FCR in 1144 pigs using Bayesian methods and the SAM.
- Utilized stochastic simulation to analyze responses to selection indexes combining direct genetic effects (DGE) and indirect genetic effects (IGE) for ADG and BF.
Main Results:
- Genetic parameters for ADG, BF, and FCR were estimated, with total genetic variance ratios to phenotypic variance ranging from 0.63 to 0.93.
- Using SAM for genetic evaluations resulted in a worse average economic response compared to AM predictions.
- Observed economic response was primarily due to a reduction in BF, not an improvement in FCR.
Conclusions:
- Social genetic effects are significant in the studied traits, but their effective use in pig breeding programs for indirect FCR improvement remains challenging.
- Correlations between IGE and DGE were insufficient to overcome unfavorable DGE correlations, and SAM genetic parameter estimates had large errors.
- These limitations penalized the average response achieved with SAM compared to AM.
More Related Videos
07:02Providing Meaningful Environmental Enrichment and Measuring Saliva Cortisol in Pigs Housed on Slatted Flooring
Published on: September 30, 2019
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021