Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Abdominal wound healing: a prospective clinical study.

T T Irvin, C J Stoddard, M G Greaney

    British Medical Journal
    |August 6, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary

    Comparing abdominal wound closure methods, this study found no significant difference in dehiscence or incisional hernia rates. Wound infection, however, dramatically increased complication risks, highlighting infection prevention as key for abdominal wound healing.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A Study of Healing in the Anal Canal and of the Severity of Post-operative Pain after Hæmorrhoidectomy [Abridged].

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine·2009
    Same author

    Preoperative shuttle walking testing and outcome after oesophagogastrectomy.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2007
    Same author

    Pylephlebitis due to perforated diverticulitis.

    Acta chirurgica Belgica·2005
    Same author

    Endoscopic ablation of Barrett's oesophagus: a randomized-controlled trial of photodynamic therapy vs. argon plasma coagulation.

    Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2004
    Same author

    Complete rectal obstruction due to ischaemia following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

    The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland·2004
    Same author

    Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

    The British journal of surgery·2004

    Area of Science:

    • Surgical techniques
    • Wound healing
    • Abdominal surgery

    Background:

    • Abdominal wound closure is crucial for patient recovery.
    • Comparing different surgical closure methods is essential for optimizing outcomes.
    • Wound complications like dehiscence and incisional hernia impact patient morbidity.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the incidence of wound dehiscence and incisional hernia between layered closure with retention sutures and single-layer mass closure.
    • To evaluate the impact of wound infection on these closure complications.

    Main Methods:

    • A randomized prospective clinical trial involving 200 patients undergoing abdominal wound closure.
    • Two closure techniques were compared: layered closure with retention sutures and single-layer mass closure.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Data collection focused on wound dehiscence and incisional hernia rates, and wound infection incidence.

    • Main Results:

    • Overall incidence of wound dehiscence was 1%, and incisional hernia was 4-7%.
    • Both closure methods demonstrated similar rates of dehiscence and herniation.
    • Wound infection was a significant risk factor, increasing the incidence of dehiscence or herniation tenfold.

    Conclusions:

    • Neither layered closure with retention sutures nor single-layer mass closure showed a significant difference in preventing abdominal wound dehiscence or incisional hernia.
    • Preventing wound infection is critical for substantially reducing the occurrence of dehiscence and herniation.
    • Focusing on infection control strategies is paramount for improving abdominal wound closure outcomes.