Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
05:37

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

Published on: August 6, 2019

6.7K

Complications and Complication Avoidance With Cervical Total Disc Replacement.

Jonathan M Parish1, Anthony M Asher2, Domagoj Coric3

  • 1Department of Neurological Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.

International Journal of Spine Surgery
|September 30, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparing those Most Satisfied versus Least Satisfied Following Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Are there Differences in Baseline Characteristics?

Spine·2026
Same author

Posterior lumbar facet arthroplasty versus fusion for the treatment of spondylolisthesis: 3-year results from the Total Posterior Spine System investigational device exemption study.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

Introduction. Contemporary spinal arthroplasty.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

Predictors of long-term myelopathy relief in patients with moderate to severe cervical spondylotic myelopathy following surgery: a Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

Is patient satisfaction static at 5 years after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

What are minimal clinically important differences for patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A 5-year Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same journal

First Human Use of a Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Interbody Implant for High-Grade Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis: A Case Report.

International journal of spine surgery·2026
Same journal

Twenty-Five-Year Failure of Spinal Allograft Incorporation in Chronic Spinal Hydatid Disease: A Case Report.

International journal of spine surgery·2026
Same journal

Response.

International journal of spine surgery·2026
Same journal

Dorsal Spinal Cord Herniation Following Thoracic Laminectomy for Medulloblastoma Metastasis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

International journal of spine surgery·2026
Same journal

Letter to the Editor: "Beyond Pain Relief: Preventing Recurrence and Preserving Function After Lumbar Discectomy".

International journal of spine surgery·2026
Same journal

Current Smoking and Acute Inpatient Outcomes After Elective Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample, 2016 to 2021.

International journal of spine surgery·2026
See all related articles

Cervical arthroplasty complications stem from poor patient selection and surgical errors. Identifying unsuitable candidates and refining surgical techniques are key to preventing adverse outcomes in artificial disc surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Spine surgery
  • Orthopedics
  • Neurosurgery

Background:

  • Cervical arthroplasty is a surgical procedure to replace a damaged cervical disc.
  • Complications can arise from patient selection and surgical technique.
  • Anterior cervical approaches carry inherent risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and discuss complications unique to cervical arthroplasty.
  • To highlight factors contributing to adverse outcomes.
  • To differentiate arthroplasty-specific complications from general surgical risks.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on cervical arthroplasty complications.
  • Analysis of patient factors influencing outcomes.
  • Evaluation of surgical technique-related complications.
Keywords:
cervical arthroplastycervical artificial disctotal disc replacement

More Related Videos

Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for Lumbar Discectomy
01:24

Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for Lumbar Discectomy

Published on: September 8, 2023

828
Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion
05:30

Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion

Published on: February 14, 2025

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
05:37

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

Published on: August 6, 2019

6.7K
Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for Lumbar Discectomy
01:24

Full-Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for Lumbar Discectomy

Published on: September 8, 2023

828
Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion
05:30

Surgical Approach and Complications of Stand-alone Lateral Trans-Psoas Interbody Fusion

Published on: February 14, 2025

1.3K

Main Results:

  • Poor patient selection (advanced spondylosis, facet arthropathy, osteoporosis, deformity, instability) increases complication risk.
  • Suboptimal surgical technique can lead to subsidence, expulsion, kyphosis, and heterotopic ossification.
  • Complications specific to cervical arthroplasty require careful consideration.

Conclusions:

  • Careful patient selection is crucial for successful cervical arthroplasty.
  • Adherence to proper surgical techniques minimizes unique complications.
  • Understanding arthroplasty-specific risks improves patient safety and outcomes.