Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device in Cardiogenic Shock: A Five-Year Single Canadian Center Initial

Cvetan Trpkov1, Jordan D Gibson2, Robert J H Miller1

  • 1Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

CJC Open
|September 30, 2020
PubMed

Insights

Mechanical circulatory support with Impella CP shows potential for carefully selected cardiogenic shock patients in Canada. Early support and monitoring lactate levels are key to improving survival outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support
  • Critical Care Medicine

Background:

  • Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (PVADs) is expanding globally.
  • There is limited Canadian data on PVAD use in cardiogenic shock (CS).
  • Conflicting reports exist regarding the benefits of PVADs in CS.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the 5-year experience with Impella CP for CS at a Canadian tertiary care center.
  • To evaluate patient characteristics, care patterns, and outcomes.
  • To identify predictors of survival.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective assessment of consecutive adult patients with CS supported by Impella CP.
  • Collection of comprehensive clinical data and outcomes.
  • Evaluation of in-hospital outcomes, 6-month survival, and survival predictors.

Main Results:

  • Thirty-four patients received Impella CP support for CS over 5 years.
  • Most patients (94%) had acute myocardial infarction and advanced CS (68% SCAI stage D or E).
  • Survival to discharge was 58%, with 100% 6-month survival for discharge survivors. SCAI CS stage and initial lactate levels were significant predictors of survival. Bleeding (26%) and vascular complications occurred.

Conclusions:

  • Impella CP may benefit carefully selected CS patients.
  • SCAI shock classification and serum lactate can aid patient selection.
  • Minimizing support time and bleeding complications are crucial. Further Canadian studies are needed.
Abstract