Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 7, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Mortality risk of antipsychotic augmentation for adult depression
Tobias Gerhard1,2, T Scott Stroup3, Christoph U Correll4,5,6
1Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research; Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.
Importance:
Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated increased all-cause mortality in elderly patients with dementia treated with newer antipsychotics. It is unknown whether this risk generalizes to non-elderly adults using newer antipsychotics as augmentation treatment for depression.
Objective:
This study examined all-cause mortality risk of newer antipsychotic augmentation for adult depression.
Design:
Population-based new-user/active comparator cohort study.
Setting:
National healthcare claims data from the US Medicaid program from 2001-2010 linked to the National Death Index.
Participants:
Non-elderly adults (25-64 years) diagnosed with depression who after ≥3 months of antidepressant monotherapy initiated either augmentation with a newer antipsychotic or with a second antidepressant. Patients with alternative indications for antipsychotic medications, such as schizophrenia, psychotic depression, or bipolar disorder, were excluded.
Exposure:
Augmentation treatment for depression with a newer antipsychotic or with a second antidepressant.
Main Outcome:
All-cause mortality during study follow-up ascertained from the National Death Index.
Results:
The analytic cohort included 39,582 patients (female = 78.5%, mean age = 44.5 years) who initiated augmentation with a newer antipsychotic (n = 22,410; 40% = quetiapine, 21% = risperidone, 17% = aripiprazole, 16% = olanzapine) or with a second antidepressant (n = 17,172). The median chlorpromazine equivalent starting dose for all newer antipsychotics was 68mg/d, increasing to 100 mg/d during follow-up. Altogether, 153 patients died during 13,328 person-years of follow-up (newer antipsychotic augmentation: n = 105, follow-up = 7,601 person-years, mortality rate = 138.1/10,000 person-years; antidepressant augmentation: n = 48, follow-up = 5,727 person-years, mortality rate = 83.8/10,000 person-years). An adjusted hazard ratio of 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 2.06) indicated increased all-cause mortality risk for newer antipsychotic augmentation compared to antidepressant augmentation (risk difference = 37.7 (95%CI, 1.7 to 88.8) per 10,000 person-years). Results were robust across several sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion:
Augmentation with newer antipsychotics in non-elderly patients with depression was associated with increased mortality risk compared with adding a second antidepressant. Though these findings require replication and cannot prove causality, physicians managing adults with depression should be aware of this potential for increased mortality associated with newer antipsychotic augmentation.
Related Concept Videos
Antidepressant Drugs: MAOIs and Other Agents
Psychosis and Antipsychotic Drugs: Overview
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Mania and Antimanic Drugs: Overview
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications
Antidepressant Drugs: Overview

